Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Md NizamuddIn Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Md Nizamuddin vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 17, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971977

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Md Nizamuddin

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi a.b.a.no.2380of2012 md.nizamuddin@nizamuddinansari. ... ... ...petitioner versus the state of jharkhand. ... ... ... ... ... ...opp. party coram: thehonblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay. forthepetitioner: mrs.smitamitra,advocate. forthestate: a.p .p. 03/17.09.2012 itrevealsfromthewrittenreportthatoneadityaprasadhadtaken loanofrs.12.50/lakhandhehasfurnishedcertaintitledeedwithrespectto theproperty.thepetitionerstoodguarantoragainsttheloanadvancedinfavour ofsaidadityaprasad.incourseofverificationthedocumentfurnishedbythe accusedpersonswerefoundforged. itissubmittedthatthepetitionerwassimplyaguarantorandhe hadnotfurnishedforgeddocumentfortheguarantee. counselforthestatehasopposedtheprayerbutconcedesthatin thecasediaryitisnotindicatedwhetherfurnishingofsaidforgedtitledeedwas knowntothepetitioneratthetimehestoodguarantor. intheaforesaidfactsandcircumstancesofthecase,thepetitioner isdirectedtosurrenderbeforethecourtbelowwithinthreeweeksfromtoday andifhedoessoheshallbereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondofrs. 10,000/ ( ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfactionofthec.j.m.,dhanbadinconnectionwithdhanbad(bankmore)p.s. caseno.351of2012,correspondingtog.r.no.1419of2012,subjecttothe conditionsaslaiddownundersection438(2)ofthecodeofcriminalprocedure. [d.n.upadhyay,j.] p.k.s.

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2380of2012 Md.Nizamuddin@NizamuddinAnsari. ... ... ...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ... ... ... ...Opp. Party CORAM: THEHONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY. ForthePetitioner: Mrs.SmitaMitra,Advocate. FortheState: A.P .P. 03/17.09.2012 ItrevealsfromthewrittenreportthatoneAdityaPrasadhadtaken loanofRs.12.50/lakhandhehasfurnishedcertainTitleDeedwithrespectto theproperty.Thepetitionerstoodguarantoragainsttheloanadvancedinfavour ofsaidAdityaPrasad.Incourseofverificationthedocumentfurnishedbythe accusedpersonswerefoundforged. Itissubmittedthatthepetitionerwassimplyaguarantorandhe hadnotfurnishedforgeddocumentfortheguarantee. CounselfortheStatehasopposedtheprayerbutconcedesthatin thecasediaryitisnotindicatedwhetherfurnishingofsaidforgedTitleDeedwas knowntothepetitioneratthetimehestoodguarantor. Intheaforesaidfactsandcircumstancesofthecase,thepetitioner isdirectedtosurrenderbeforethecourtbelowwithinthreeweeksfromtoday andifhedoessoheshallbereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondofRs. 10,000/ ( Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfactionoftheC.J.M.,DhanbadinconnectionwithDhanbad(BankMore)P.S. CaseNo.351of2012,correspondingtoG.R.No.1419of2012,subjecttothe conditionsaslaiddownunderSection438(2)oftheCodeofCriminalProcedure. [D.N.Upadhyay,J.] P.K.S.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2012 Same Parties Md Nizamuddin vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales