Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Parvati Devi and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Parvati Devi and ors vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 17, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971924

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Parvati Devi and ors

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi a.b.a.no.2026of2012 1. parvatidevi.2. anitadevi.3. dukhnidevi.4. sabitridevi.5. umadevi.6. sumadevi.7. santidevi.8. maltidevi.9. babanmahto.10. amritmahto.11. sunilmahto.12. yamunamahto.13. pintumahto. ... ... ... ... ... ...petitioners versus the state of jharkhand. ... ... ... ... ... ...opp. party coram: thehonblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay. forthepetitioner: mr.h.k.shikarwar,advocate. forthestate: a.p .p. 03/17.09.2012 itisallegedinthefirstinformationreportthatthepetitionerswith theirassociatesafterformingunlawfulassembly,committedhousetrespassand causedassaulttotheinformantandhisfamilymembers. itissubmittedthatthespecificallegationofcausingassaultisonly againstsantoshimahtoandtheallegationoftheftisagainstgyanimahto,who are not the petitioner at present. as a matter of fact, the petitioners and the informantarethegotiasandtheyarehavinglanddispute. learnedcounselforthestatehasopposedtheprayer. it seems that maximum numbers of family members of accused havebeenimplicatedwithgeneralandomnibusallegation. consideringtheaforesaidaspectofthematter,thepetitionersare directedtosurrenderbeforethecourtbelowwithinthreeweeksfromtodayand iftheydosotheywillbereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/ (tenthousand)eachwithtwosuretiesoflikeamounteachtothesatisfactionof srisanjaysinghyadav,judicialmagistrate,1stclass,hazaribaghinconnection with tatijhariya p.s. case no. 11 of 2012, corresponding to g.r.no. 1052 of 2012,subjecttotheconditionsaslaiddownundersection438(2)ofthecodeof criminalprocedure. [d.n.upadhyay,j.] p.k.s.

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2026of2012 1. ParvatiDevi.

2. AnitaDevi.

3. DukhniDevi.

4. SabitriDevi.

5. UmaDevi.

6. SumaDevi.

7. SantiDevi.

8. MaltiDevi.

9. BabanMahto.

10. AmritMahto.

11. SunilMahto.

12. YamunaMahto.

13. PintuMahto. ... ... ... ... ... ...Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ... ... ... ...Opp. Party CORAM: THEHONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY. ForthePetitioner: Mr.H.K.Shikarwar,Advocate. FortheState: A.P .P. 03/17.09.2012 ItisallegedintheFirstInformationReportthatthepetitionerswith theirassociatesafterformingunlawfulassembly,committedhousetrespassand causedassaulttotheinformantandhisfamilymembers. Itissubmittedthatthespecificallegationofcausingassaultisonly againstSantoshiMahtoandtheallegationoftheftisagainstGyaniMahto,who are not the petitioner at present. As a matter of fact, the petitioners and the informantaretheGotiasandtheyarehavinglanddispute. LearnedCounselfortheStatehasopposedtheprayer. It seems that maximum numbers of family members of accused havebeenimplicatedwithgeneralandomnibusallegation. Consideringtheaforesaidaspectofthematter,thepetitionersare directedtosurrenderbeforethecourtbelowwithinthreeweeksfromtodayand iftheydosotheywillbereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/ (Tenthousand)eachwithtwosuretiesoflikeamounteachtothesatisfactionof SriSanjaySinghYadav,JudicialMagistrate,1stClass,Hazaribaghinconnection with Tatijhariya P.S. Case No. 11 of 2012, corresponding to G.R.No. 1052 of 2012,subjecttotheconditionsaslaiddownunderSection438(2)oftheCodeof CriminalProcedure. [D.N.Upadhyay,J.] P.K.S.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2012 Same Parties Parvati Devi and ors vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Criminal
Criminal

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales