Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bhola Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Bhola Singh vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 17, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971923

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bhola Singh

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b. a. no. 4719 of 2012 bhola singh ..... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand .. opposite party -------- coram : honble mr. justice h. c. mishra ------ for the petitioner : mr. d.k. chakraborty, advocate for the state : mr. sanjay kumar srivastava, a.p.p. ------ 4/ 17.09.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned a.p.p. for the prosecution. the petitioner has been made accused for the offence under section 364(a)/34 of the indian penal code, in connection with daltonganj rail p.s. case no. 4 of 2011 corresponding to g.r. no. 265 of 2011 (s.t. no. 128 of 2011). the case relates to abduction of the stationmaster by four unknown culprits and the case was instituted against unknown. learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, he has neither been identified nor named in the f.i.r. learned counsel has accordingly prayed for bail. learned a.p.p. for the state has opposed the prayer for bail submitting that two witnesses have named the petitioner stating that the victim was kept at the house of the petitioner, but upon going through the charge sheet, he has very fairly conceded that these witnesses are not charge sheet witnesses. in the facts of the case, i am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, bhola singh, on bail. accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned principal sessions judge, latehar, in connection with s.t. no. 128 of 2011 arising out of daltonganj rail p.s. case no. 4 of 2011 corresponding to g.r. no. 265 of 2011. ( h. c. mishra, j.) r.kr.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 4719 of 2012 Bhola Singh ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Chakraborty, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P. ------ 4/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 364(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Daltonganj Rail P.S. Case No. 4 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 265 of 2011 (S.T. No. 128 of 2011). The case relates to abduction of the Stationmaster by four unknown culprits and the case was instituted against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, he has neither been identified nor named in the F.I.R. Learned counsel has accordingly prayed for bail. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail submitting that two witnesses have named the petitioner stating that the victim was kept at the house of the petitioner, but upon going through the charge sheet, he has very fairly conceded that these witnesses are not charge sheet witnesses. In the facts of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Bhola Singh, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Principal Sessions Judge, Latehar, in connection with S.T. No. 128 of 2011 arising out of Daltonganj Rail P.S. Case No. 4 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 265 of 2011. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial