Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sakra Oraon Vs. State of Jharkhand

Sakra Oraon vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jan 10, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971900

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sakra Oraon

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi i.a.no.3299 of 2012 in cr. appeal (d.b.)no. 1069 of 2012 sakra oraon. ... ... ... ... ...appellant -versus- the state of jharkhand. ... ... ... ... ...respondent -------------- coram: hon'ble mr. justice d.n.patel hon'ble mr. justice d.n.upadhyay -------------- for the appellant: mr. kumar nilesh, advocate. for the state: a.p.p. -------------- 04/ dated 10th january, 2013 oral order: per d.n.patel,j:1. the present application has been preferred under section 5 of the limitation act for condonation of delay of 105 days in preferring the criminal appeal.2. having heard the learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the reasons stated in this interlocutory application especially in paragraph no.4 there are reasonable reasons for condonation of delay.3. we, therefore, condone the delay and allow this interlocutory application.4. registry is directed to enlist this cr. appeal on the board of admission on 17th january, 2013. [d.n.patel,j.] [d.n.upadhyay,j.] p.k.s.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A.No.3299 of 2012 IN Cr. Appeal (D.B.)No. 1069 of 2012 Sakra Oraon. ... ... ... ... ...Appellant -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ... ... ...Respondent -------------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY -------------- For the Appellant: Mr. Kumar Nilesh, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. -------------- 04/ Dated 10th January, 2013 Oral order: Per D.N.Patel,J:

1. The present application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 105 days in preferring the Criminal Appeal.

2. Having heard the learned Counsel for both the sides and looking to the reasons stated in this Interlocutory Application especially in paragraph No.4 there are reasonable reasons for condonation of delay.

3. We, therefore, condone the delay and allow this Interlocutory Application.

4. Registry is directed to enlist this Cr. Appeal on the board of Admission on 17th January, 2013. [D.N.Patel,J.] [D.N.Upadhyay,J.] P.K.S.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial