Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Md Sohail Vs. State of Jharkhand

Md Sohail vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jan 10, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971894

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Md Sohail

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a. b.a. no. 3453 of 2012 md. sohail .........petitioner vs. the state of jharkhand & anr ........opposite parties coram: hon'ble mr. justice prashant kumar for the petitioner: mr. amit kumar for the state: mr. pramod kumar choudhary ,app for the o.p. no. 2: mr. faruque ansari 4/10.01.2013: anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner md. sohail is moved by sri amit kumar and opposed by sri pramod kumar choudhary, learned additional p.p. and md. faruque ansari, counsel for the o.p. no.2. it is alleged that in the year 2008 petitioner attempted to commit rape upon the complainant who happens to be the sister-in- law of the petitioner. thereafter, no case lodged against petitioner in the year 2008. it also appears from the statement of the complainant that she left her in-laws house in the year 2009, but thereafter also she has not filed any case. it then appears that husband of complainant filed a matrimonial suit vide matrimonial title suit no. 11 of 2010 for restitution of conjugal right, which was decreed on 16.5.2011. it appears that present complaint filed on 10.5.2011 i.e. six days before the decree passed in aforesaid matrimonial suit. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance , i allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 22.01.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned s.d.j.m., jamshedpur in connection with c/1 case no. 1612 of 2011 , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. ( prashant kumar,j.) sharda/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 3453 of 2012 Md. Sohail .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Amit Kumar For the State: Mr. Pramod Kumar Choudhary ,APP For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Faruque Ansari 4/10.01.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Md. Sohail is moved by Sri Amit Kumar and opposed by Sri Pramod Kumar Choudhary, learned Additional P.P. and Md. Faruque Ansari, counsel for the O.P. No.

2. It is alleged that in the year 2008 petitioner attempted to commit rape upon the complainant who happens to be the sister-in- law of the petitioner. Thereafter, no case lodged against petitioner in the year 2008. It also appears from the statement of the complainant that she left her in-laws house in the year 2009, but thereafter also she has not filed any case. It then appears that husband of complainant filed a matrimonial suit vide Matrimonial Title Suit No. 11 of 2010 for restitution of conjugal right, which was decreed on 16.5.2011. It appears that present complaint filed on 10.5.2011 i.e. six days before the decree passed in aforesaid matrimonial suit. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance , I allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 22.01.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jamshedpur in connection with C/1 Case No. 1612 of 2011 , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial