Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ram Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr

Ram Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jan 10, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971885

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ram Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr,m.p no.40 of 2013 ram kumar ............... .................................petitioner versus state of jharkhand and another........opposite parties coram: honble mr.justice r.r.prasad for the petitioner : mr. indrajit sinha for the state :2. 10.1.13. for the time being defect no.9(i) is ignored. however, the same be removed later on. at the same time, defect no.9(iii) is ignored. so far the defect no.9(ii) is concerned, the same be removed in course of the day. issue notice to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or, if possible, disposed of at the admission stage itself, for which requisites for issuance of notice must be filed within a week. at the same time, petitioner would be at liberty to take step for personal service of notice upon the opposite party no.2. on filing affidavit regarding service of notice or on appearance of opposite party no.2, let this matter be listed. until further order, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in c-1 case no.136 of 1998, pending in the court of judicial magistrate, 1st class, jamshedpur. ( r.r.prasad, j.) nd/

Full Judgment

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr,M.P No.40 of 2013 Ram Kumar ............... .................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another........Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State :

2. 10.1.13. For the time being defect no.9(i) is ignored. However, the same be removed later on. At the same time, defect no.9(iii) is ignored. So far the defect no.9(ii) is concerned, the same be removed in course of the day. Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or, if possible, disposed of at the admission stage itself, for which requisites for issuance of notice must be filed within a week. At the same time, petitioner would be at liberty to take step for personal service of notice upon the opposite party no.2. On filing affidavit regarding service of notice or on appearance of opposite party no.2, let this matter be listed. Until further order, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in C-1 case no.136 of 1998, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Jamshedpur. ( R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial