Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jagdish Mahto Vs. Bimla Devi

Jagdish Mahto vs Bimla Devi

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Mar 06, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971806

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jagdish Mahto

Respondent

Bimla Devi

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(c) no. 6211 of 2012 jagdish mahto & another ...petitioners versus mathura mahto respondent -------- coram: the honble mr justice p.p. bhatt -------- for the petitioners : m/s. ananda sen & nagmani tiwari, advocates /6.3.2013: learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with a view to file appropriate application before the competent court. permission, as sought for, is hereby granted. accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. as and when such application is moved by the petitioners, the same shall be decided by the competent court in accordance with law. . (p.p. bhatt, j.) s.b.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6211 of 2012 Jagdish Mahto & another ...Petitioners Versus Mathura Mahto Respondent -------- Coram: THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------- For the Petitioners : M/s. Ananda Sen & Nagmani Tiwari, Advocates /6.3.2013: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with a view to file appropriate application before the competent court. Permission, as sought for, is hereby granted. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. As and when such application is moved by the petitioners, the same shall be decided by the competent court in accordance with law. . (P.P. Bhatt, J.) S.B.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial