Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dilip Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Dilip Kumar Singh vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 01, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971710

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dilip Kumar Singh

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no. 6287 of 2012 dilip kumar singh ... petitioner. versus the state of jharkhand ... opp. party. coram: - honble mr. justice alok singh ------------- for the petitioner(s) : mr. a.k. kashyap sr. advocate m/s ravi prakash & awanish shekhar, adv. for the state : mr. moti gope, a.p.p. 02/01.09.2012: learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated in the present case on the basis of confessional statement made by the co-accused, namely, manoj bhuiyan. he further submits that the confessional statement made by co-accused cannot be made basis for conviction of the accused applicant. he further contends that battery recovered from the house of the petitioner, belongs to the father of the petitioner and father of the petitioner has already moved an application for release of the battery in question before the magistrate. he further contends that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.06.2012. considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, i direct that let the petitioner, namely, dilip kumar singh be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties bond to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, palamau at daltonganj, in connection with paton p.s. case no. 41 of 2012 (corresponding to g.r. no. 618 of 2012). (alok singh, j) sharma

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6287 of 2012 Dilip Kumar Singh ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opp. Party. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH ------------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Kashyap Sr. Advocate M/s Ravi Prakash & Awanish Shekhar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Moti Gope, A.P.P. 02/01.09.2012: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated in the present case on the basis of confessional statement made by the co-accused, namely, Manoj Bhuiyan. He further submits that the confessional statement made by co-accused cannot be made basis for conviction of the accused applicant. He further contends that battery recovered from the house of the petitioner, belongs to the father of the petitioner and father of the petitioner has already moved an application for release of the battery in question before the Magistrate. He further contends that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.06.2012. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct that let the petitioner, namely, Dilip Kumar Singh be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties bond to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau at Daltonganj, in connection with Paton P.S. Case No. 41 of 2012 (corresponding to G.R. No. 618 of 2012). (ALOK SINGH, J) Sharma

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial