Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Sumitra Devi and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand

Sumitra Devi and ors vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 01, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971686

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sumitra Devi and ors

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

.....standrejectedwithoutfurtherreferencetothebench. ruleismadereturnableintheadmissionmatterwithinsix weeks. till1stnovember,2012,policewillnotarrestthepetitioners namely sumitra devi and pintu yadav @ pintu kumar yadav in connectionwiththepresentcasei.e.kodermamahilap.s.caseno.28 of2011correspondingtog.r.no.1112of2011pendinginthecourtof shriv.k.srivastava,civiljudge,judicialdivisionno.6,koderma. counselappearingforthepetitionershassubmittedthatthe petitionerno.3 is married sisterinlawand she is residingin another village,therefore,itisfalsetosaythatshehascommittedanyoffenceor assaultedthecomplainant. considering the fact that the petitioner no.3 is married sisterinlawandsheisresidinginanothervillage,idirectthepetitioner no.3 namely saraswati devi, above named, to surrender in the trial court/courtbelowwithinaperiodofonemonthfromthedateofthis (2) a.b.a.no.2443of2012 orderandifshesurrenders,thetrialcourt/courtbelowwillreleaseher onbailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rs.tenthousand)with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of shri v.k. srivastava, civil judge,juniordivision no.6,kodermainconnection withkodermamahilap.s.caseno.28of2011correspondingtog.r. no.1112of2011withtheconditionsthatoneofthebailorswillbelocal residenthavingimmovablepropertywithinthejurisdictionofthedistrict concernedandsubjecttotheconditionslaiddownundersection438(2) ofthecodeofcriminalprocedure. counselforthepetitionerswilldepositthecostofthefaxto communicatethisordertothecourtconcerned. (jayaroy,j.) anit

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2443of2012 1.SumitraDevi 2.PintuYadav@PintuKumarYadav 3.SaraswatiDevi ... ... Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand ... ... ...OppositeParty CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioners :Mr.DeepakKumar,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. 02/01.09.2012 Heard counsel appearing for the petitioners and counsel appearingfortheState. Petitionersare apprehending their arrest inconnection with the case registered under Sections 323/504/498A/379 of the IndianPenalCode. Counselappearingforthepetitionersispermittedtoaddthe informant/complainantasoppositepartyno.2inthiscase. Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 in the admission matteratherpresentandcorrectaddressbyregisteredpostwithA/Das wellasbyordinaryprocess,forwhichrequisiteetc.mustbefiledwithin oneweekfromthedateofthisorder,failingwhichthisapplicationshall standrejectedwithoutfurtherreferencetotheBench. Ruleismadereturnableintheadmissionmatterwithinsix weeks. Till1stNovember,2012,policewillnotarrestthepetitioners namely Sumitra Devi and Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar Yadav in connectionwiththepresentcasei.e.KodermaMahilaP.S.CaseNo.28 of2011correspondingtoG.R.No.1112of2011pendingintheCourtof ShriV.K.Srivastava,CivilJudge,JudicialDivisionNo.6,Koderma. Counselappearingforthepetitionershassubmittedthatthe petitionerno.3 is married sisterinlawand she is residingin another village,therefore,itisfalsetosaythatshehascommittedanyoffenceor assaultedthecomplainant. Considering the fact that the petitioner no.3 is married sisterinlawandsheisresidinginanothervillage,Idirectthepetitioner no.3 namely Saraswati Devi, above named, to surrender in the trial Court/Courtbelowwithinaperiodofonemonthfromthedateofthis (2) A.B.A.No.2443of2012 orderandifshesurrenders,thetrialCourt/Courtbelowwillreleaseher onbailonfurnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(Rs.Tenthousand)with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri V.K. Srivastava, Civil Judge,JuniorDivision No.6,Kodermainconnection withKodermaMahilaP.S.CaseNo.28of2011correspondingtoG.R. No.1112of2011withtheconditionsthatoneofthebailorswillbelocal residenthavingimmovablepropertywithinthejurisdictionofthedistrict concernedandsubjecttotheconditionslaiddownunderSection438(2) oftheCodeofCriminalProcedure. CounselforthepetitionerswilldepositthecostoftheFAXto communicatethisordertotheCourtconcerned. (JayaRoy,J.) Anit

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2012 Same Parties Sumitra Devi and ors vs State of Jharkhand Same Subject Criminal
Criminal

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales