Sunita Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Sunita Devi vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 01, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971656

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/971656
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Sep 01, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunita Devi

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

.....436 and he was not cleaning any part of the plot no. 435, but he was cleaning the part of the plot no.436. he has further submitted that the authority concerned has not made any measurement of the area of the plot numbers to verify whether the petitioner has actually cleaning the bush of the part of the plot no. 435, as the plot no.436, which belongs to the petitioner is adjacent to the plot no.435. learned counsel for the state has opposed but not disputed the aforesaid submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and he has accepted that the petitioner is also having land adjacent to the plot no. 435 and it is not clear whether the petitioner was cleaning the part of his land i.e. plot no. 436 or part of the plot no.435. considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to surrender in the court below within a period of one month from the date of this order i.e. 01.09.2012. if he surrenders within the said period, the trial court is directed to release him on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (rs. ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of sub-divisional judicial magistrate, latehar in connection with c.f. case no. 7 of 2011, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be local resident having immovable property within the jurisdiction of the district concern and also subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (jaya roy, j.) satayendra

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2483 of 2012 Vijay Uraon @ Vijayanand Bhagat ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajan Raj, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 03/01.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 33 of the Indian Forest Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that he was cleaning the bush in the forest area within the plot No.

435. It is contended that the petitioner is the owner of the plot No. 436 and he was not cleaning any part of the plot No. 435, but he was cleaning the part of the plot No.

436. He has further submitted that the authority concerned has not made any measurement of the area of the plot numbers to verify whether the petitioner has actually cleaning the bush of the part of the plot No. 435, as the plot No.436, which belongs to the petitioner is adjacent to the plot No.

435. Learned counsel for the State has opposed but not disputed the aforesaid submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and he has accepted that the petitioner is also having land adjacent to the plot No. 435 and it is not clear whether the petitioner was cleaning the part of his land i.e. plot No. 436 or part of the plot No.

435. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to surrender in the court below within a period of one month from the date of this order i.e. 01.09.2012. If he surrenders within the said period, the trial Court is directed to release him on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Latehar in connection with C.F. Case No. 7 of 2011, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be local resident having immovable property within the jurisdiction of the District concern and also subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2012 Same Parties Sunita Devi vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education