Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Md Nayeem and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Md Nayeem and ors vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 01, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971648

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Md Nayeem and ors

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b. a. no. 6254 of 2012 --- 1.md. nayeem 2.md. tahir 3.bibi jahida 4.najbuddin alias nejmuddin petitioners versus the state of jharkhand opposite party --- coram : hon'ble mr. justice alok singh --- for the petitioners : mr. manoj kumar jha, advocate for the opposite party : mr. laxmi murmu, a.p.p. --- 2/01.09.2012 present application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with mahagama p.s. case no. 94 of 2011 corresponding to g.r. no. 693 of 2011 registered under sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 504, 452 & 380 of the indian penal code. present accused is facing trial for committing the murder of brother of the informant i.e. sessions case no. 329 of 2010. in the sessions trial, applicant was released on bail. after coming out on bail, applicant threatened the applicant to withdraw the case of the murder of his brother and on denial has assaulted the complainant and has looted the household articles of the complainant. after investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted against the applicant. this is high time when judicial forums must ensure safety of the complainant and the witnesses in pending criminal trials. present case is a glaring example of the misuse of bail granted to the applicant. as discussed above, the applicant, who is facing murder case trial, after coming out on bail not only threatened but has assaulted the complainant witnesses of the murder case and on denial has looted household articles. therefore, applicant is not entitled for any bail. accordingly, this bail application is dismissed. (alok singh, j.) r.shekharcp3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6254 of 2012 --- 1.Md. Nayeem 2.Md. Tahir 3.Bibi Jahida 4.Najbuddin alias Nejmuddin Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Laxmi Murmu, A.P.P. --- 2/01.09.2012 Present application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 94 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 693 of 2011 registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 504, 452 & 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Present accused is facing trial for committing the murder of brother of the informant i.e. Sessions Case No. 329 of 2010. In the sessions trial, applicant was released on bail. After coming out on bail, applicant threatened the applicant to withdraw the case of the murder of his brother and on denial has assaulted the complainant and has looted the household articles of the complainant. After investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted against the applicant. This is high time when judicial forums must ensure safety of the complainant and the witnesses in pending criminal trials. Present case is a glaring example of the misuse of bail granted to the applicant. As discussed above, the applicant, who is facing murder case trial, after coming out on bail not only threatened but has assaulted the complainant witnesses of the murder case and on denial has looted household articles. Therefore, applicant is not entitled for any bail. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed. (Alok Singh, J.) R.ShekharCp3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial