Binod Kumar Rawani Alias Binod Rawani Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Binod Kumar Rawani Alias Binod Rawani vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Feb 05, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971615

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/971615
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Feb 05, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Binod Kumar Rawani Alias Binod Rawani

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi b.a.no.217of2013 binodkumarrawani@binodrawani petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand oppositeparty coram: honblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay forthepetitioner :mr.someshwarroy,advocate forthestate :a.p .p. 02/05.02.2013 heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. the petitioner is accused in connection with kotwali p.s. case no.1254 of 2011 corresponding to g.r. no.6511 of 2011 registered under sections407&120boftheindianpenalcodewhichispendinginthecourtof learnedchiefjudicialmagistrate,ranchi. itrevealsfromthef.i.r.thatavancarryingcashfromthebankwas looted by the miscreants. in course of investigation one of the coaccused disclosedthenameofthepresentpetitioneranddescribedhisinvolvementin thecrime.onsearchasumofrs.3,50,000/wasrecoveredfromthehouseof thepetitionerandhewasalsoidentifiedinthet.i.p. itissubmittedthatthepetitionerwasnotatallpresentatthetime ofrecoveryofcashfromhishouse. thet.i.p.washeldafteralongdelayand thereforeitisnotareliableevidence. thepetitionerisinjailcustodysince abouttenmonths. learnedcounsel,appearing for the state opposedthe prayerfor bailandsubmittedthatthereareampleevidencesinthecasediaryagainstthe petitioner and looted money to the tune of rs.3,50,000/ has also been recovered. consideringtheevidencecollectedbythei.o.inthecasediary,ido notfeelinclinedtoconsiderprayerforbailofthepetitioner. accordingly,the prayerforbailmadeonbehalfofthepetitionerstandsrejected. (d.n.upadhyay,j.) nkc

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.217of2013 BinodKumarRawani@BinodRawani Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.SomeshwarRoy,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/05.02.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. The petitioner is accused in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.1254 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No.6511 of 2011 registered under Sections407&120BoftheIndianPenalCodewhichispendingintheCourtof learnedChiefJudicialMagistrate,Ranchi. ItrevealsfromtheF.I.R.thatavancarryingcashfromthebankwas looted by the miscreants. In course of investigation one of the coaccused disclosedthenameofthepresentpetitioneranddescribedhisinvolvementin thecrime.OnsearchasumofRs.3,50,000/wasrecoveredfromthehouseof thepetitionerandhewasalsoidentifiedintheT.I.P. Itissubmittedthatthepetitionerwasnotatallpresentatthetime ofrecoveryofcashfromhishouse. TheT.I.P.washeldafteralongdelayand thereforeitisnotareliableevidence. Thepetitionerisinjailcustodysince abouttenmonths. Learnedcounsel,appearing for the State opposedthe prayerfor bailandsubmittedthatthereareampleevidencesinthecasediaryagainstthe petitioner and looted money to the tune of Rs.3,50,000/ has also been recovered. ConsideringtheevidencecollectedbytheI.O.inthecasediary,Ido notfeelinclinedtoconsiderprayerforbailofthepetitioner. Accordingly,the prayerforbailmadeonbehalfofthepetitionerstandsrejected. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Binod Kumar Rawani Alias Binod Rawani vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education