Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dharmi Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr

Dharmi Devi vs The State of Jharkhand and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Feb 05, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971599

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dharmi Devi

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand and anr

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi b.a.no.215of2013 dharmidevi petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand oppositeparty coram: honblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay forthepetitioner :mr.mukeshbiharilal,advocate forthestate :app 02/05.02.2013 heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. thepetitionerisaccusedinacaseregisteredundersections498a, 376&511oftheindianpenalcodeandsection3/4ofthedowryprohibition act. itrevealsthattheinformantwassubjectedtotortureandtreated with cruelty for want of more dowry. her fatherinlaw tried to establish physicalrelationwithher. itissubmittedthatthepetitionerismotherinlawwhereasfather inlaw against whom there is serious allegation, has been granted bail by a benchofthiscourtvideb.a.no.8861of2012. thehusbandhasalsobeen grantedbailtodayitselfvideb.a.no.576of2013byabenchofthiscourt. learnedcounsel,appearing for the state opposedthe prayerfor bail. consideringthefactthatthehusbandandfatherinlawhavebeen grantedbail,abovenamedpetitionerisalsodirectedto bereleasedonbailon furnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand)withtwosuretiesof the like amounteachtothe satisfaction of the courtof sri amareshkumar, learned judicial magistrate 1st class, dhanbad in connection with jogta (loyabad) p.s. case no.90 of 2012 corresponding to g.r. case no.3585 of 2012. (d.n.upadhyay,j.) nkc

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.215of2013 DharmiDevi Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.MukeshBihariLal,Advocate FortheState :APP 02/05.02.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ThepetitionerisaccusedinacaseregisteredunderSections498A, 376&511oftheIndianPenalCodeandSection3/4oftheDowryProhibition Act. Itrevealsthattheinformantwassubjectedtotortureandtreated with cruelty for want of more dowry. Her fatherinlaw tried to establish physicalrelationwithher. Itissubmittedthatthepetitionerismotherinlawwhereasfather inlaw against whom there is serious allegation, has been granted bail by a BenchofthisCourtvideB.A.No.8861of2012. Thehusbandhasalsobeen grantedbailtodayitselfvideB.A.No.576of2013byaBenchofthisCourt. Learnedcounsel,appearing for the State opposedthe prayerfor bail. Consideringthefactthatthehusbandandfatherinlawhavebeen grantedbail,abovenamedpetitionerisalsodirectedto bereleasedonbailon furnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(RupeesTenThousand)withtwosuretiesof the like amounteachtothe satisfaction of the Courtof Sri AmareshKumar, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Jogta (Loyabad) P.S. Case No.90 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. Case No.3585 of 2012. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial