Savitri Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Savitri Devi vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Feb 05, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971591

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/971591
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Feb 05, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Savitri Devi

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no. 230 of 2013 savitri devi ..... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand . opposite party coram: honble mr. justice h. c. mishra for the petitioner :mr. anil kumar for the state :a. p.p. ----- 03/05.02.2013 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned a.p.p. for the prosecution. petitioner has been made accused for the offence under sections 304(b) of the indian penal code, in connection with paton p.s. case no. 51 of 2011, corresponding to g.r. no. 798 of 2011 (s. t. no. 58 of 2012). the petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased and there is direct allegation against the petitioner and the other co-accused persons to have subjected the deceased to cruelty and torture for demand of dowry and to have committed her dowry death. earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by order dated 22.09.2011 in b. a. no. 6672 of 2011. learned counsel for the petitioner has renewed the prayer for bail. in the facts and circumstances of the case, i am not inclined to release the petitioner savitri devi on bail. accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. (h. c. mishra, j) umesh/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 230 of 2013 Savitri Devi ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Anil Kumar For the State :A. P.P. ----- 03/05.02.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Paton P.S. Case No. 51 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 798 of 2011 (S. T. No. 58 of 2012). The petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased and there is direct allegation against the petitioner and the other co-accused persons to have subjected the deceased to cruelty and torture for demand of dowry and to have committed her dowry death. Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by order dated 22.09.2011 in B. A. No. 6672 of 2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner has renewed the prayer for bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner Savitri Devi on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. (H. C. Mishra, J) Umesh/-

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Savitri Devi vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education