Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sanjay Kachhap Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Sanjay Kachhap vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Feb 05, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971589

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanjay Kachhap

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi b.a.no.10446of2012 with b.a.no.56of2013 with b.a.no.13of2013 amritkachhap petitioner(inb.a.no.10446of2012) sanjaykachhap petitioner(inb.a.no.56of2013) joginderoraon petitioner(inb.a.no.13of2013) versus thestateofjharkhand oppositeparty coram: honblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay forthepetitioners :m/sganeshpathak&s.k.upadhyay,advocates forthestate :app 03/05.02.2013 heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. the petitioners are accused in a case registered under sections 302/34oftheindianpenalcodeandsection27ofthearmsact. itrevealsthatthehusbandoftheinformantwaskilledwhenhe wasreturningfromblockoffice.theinformanthasraisedsuspicionagainstthe petitionersandotheraccusedwithwhomhewashavingpreviousenmity. itissubmittedthatoneofthecoaccuseddeepaksinghhasbeen grantedbailbyabenchofthiscourtvideb.a.no.493of2013. thereisno direct or circumstantial evidence available in the case diary against these petitioners. learned counsel of the state submitted that the movement of accusedpersonswasnoticedbywitnesseswhohavebeenexaminedinpara29, 30and48ofthecasediary. thedeceasedwasmurderedunderaconspiracy hatchedoutbytheaccusedpersonsincludingthesepetitioners. sinceoneofthecoaccused,havingmoreorlesssimilarallegation, hasbeengrantedbailbyabenchofthiscourt,abovenamedpetitionersarealso directedto bereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupees tenthousand)eachwithtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfaction of the court of sri rajiv ranjan, learned judicial magistrate, ranchi in connection with itki p.s. case no.50 of 2012 corresponding to g.r. case no.5034of2012. (d.n.upadhyay,j.) nkc

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.10446of2012 with B.A.No.56of2013 with B.A.No.13of2013 AmritKachhap Petitioner(InB.A.No.10446of2012) SanjayKachhap Petitioner(InB.A.No.56of2013) JoginderOraon Petitioner(InB.A.No.13of2013) Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioners :M/sGaneshPathak&S.K.Upadhyay,Advocates FortheState :APP 03/05.02.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. The petitioners are accused in a case registered under Sections 302/34oftheIndianPenalCodeandSection27oftheArmsAct. Itrevealsthatthehusbandoftheinformantwaskilledwhenhe wasreturningfromBlockOffice.Theinformanthasraisedsuspicionagainstthe petitionersandotheraccusedwithwhomhewashavingpreviousenmity. ItissubmittedthatoneofthecoaccusedDeepakSinghhasbeen grantedbailbyaBenchofthisCourtvideB.A.No.493of2013. Thereisno direct or circumstantial evidence available in the case diary against these petitioners. Learned counsel of the State submitted that the movement of accusedpersonswasnoticedbywitnesseswhohavebeenexaminedinpara29, 30and48ofthecasediary. Thedeceasedwasmurderedunderaconspiracy hatchedoutbytheaccusedpersonsincludingthesepetitioners. Sinceoneofthecoaccused,havingmoreorlesssimilarallegation, hasbeengrantedbailbyaBenchofthisCourt,abovenamedpetitionersarealso directedto bereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(Rupees TenThousand)eachwithtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfaction of the Court of Sri Rajiv Ranjan, learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Itki P.S. Case No.50 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. Case No.5034of2012. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial