Anil Ram Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Anil Ram vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Feb 05, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971564

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/971564
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Feb 05, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anil Ram

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand ranchi a. b. a. no. 3999 o”1. anil ram 2.chhathani devi ... ... ... petitioners versus the state of jharkhand ... ... opp. party coram: the honble mr. justice prashant kumar ............ for the petitioners : mr. manoj kumar no.-2 for the opp. party : mr. amitabh, a.p.p. ........ 5/05.02.2013 anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners anil ram and chhathani devi is moved by sri manoj kumar no.-2 learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by sri amitabh, learned additional pp. for the state. from perusal of statement of victim girl under section 164 of the cr. p.c., at paragraph no. 120 of the case diary, it appears that she eloped with co-accused ranjit ram @ chhotu out of her own sweet will. no allegation made against these petitioners. medical report reveals that victim is aged about 19 years. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, i allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioners to surrender in the court below on or before 14th of february 2013 and in the event of their surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge them on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned sub-divisional judicial magistrate, garhwa in connection with nagar untari p.s. case no. 26 of 2012 corresponding to g.r. no. 360 of 2012, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c. (prashant kumar, j.) binit

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3999 o”

1. Anil Ram 2.Chhathani Devi ... ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kumar No.-2 For the Opp. Party : Mr. Amitabh, A.P.P. ........ 5/05.02.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Anil Ram and Chhathani Devi is moved by Sri Manoj Kumar No.-2 learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Amitabh, learned Additional PP. for the State. From perusal of statement of victim girl under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C., at paragraph No. 120 of the case diary, it appears that she eloped with co-accused Ranjit Ram @ Chhotu out of her own sweet will. No allegation made against these petitioners. Medical report reveals that victim is aged about 19 years. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioners to surrender in the court below on or before 14th of February 2013 and in the event of their surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge them on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Garhwa in connection with Nagar Untari P.S. Case No. 26 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 360 of 2012, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Anil Ram vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education