Sajjad and anr Vs. Md.Taiyab

Sajjad and anr vs Md.Taiyab

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Feb 05, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971540

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/971540
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Feb 05, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sajjad and anr

Respondent

Md.Taiyab

Excerpt

.....petitioners by way of filing this writ petition under article 227 of the constitution of india have prayed for quashing the order 17.3.2008 and 23.4.2008 passed by the learned court of sub-judge-iv giridih in title suit no. 86 of 2002 whereby the learned court has rejected the applications filed under order 1rule 10(2) of the code of civil procedure. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondents. perused the impugned order as well as other materials placed on record. on perusal of the impugned order it appears that the court below has considered the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and specific finding has been recorded while dealing with the said application that the property i.e. khata no. 58 claimed by the present petitioners is not in any way concerned about the subject matter of the suit property. both properties are different and it has been specifically recorded by the court belowthat even the plaintiff- respondent is not claiming any thing in respect of the suit property. the plaintiff is claiming suit land bearing khata no. 79.. thus the property i.e. khata no. 58 claimed by the present petitioners is not in any way concerned about the subject matter of the suit property. thus the present petitioners are unable to make out a case to entertain this petition under article 227 of the constitution of india. this court is of the view that the learned court below has not committed any jurisdictional error in passing the impugned order and therefore the present petition deserves to be dismissed. the ad-interim order that has been passed on 2.7.2007 is ordered to be vacated. if the petitioners wants to claim any right,title and interest in the respect of suit property claimed by them against the respondents then in that case they can file separate suit claiming right,title and interest in respect of the same. (p.p.bhatt,j) sd

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND,RANCHI. W.P(C) No. 2876 of 2008 Sajjad &Anrs .............................................. Petitioners Versus Husna Ara &Ors . ...............................Respondents CORAM :- HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Kumar For the Respondent : Mr.S.K. Sharma .2/5.2.2013. The present petitioners by way of filing this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India have prayed for quashing the order 17.3.2008 and 23.4.2008 passed by the learned court of Sub-Judge-IV Giridih in Title Suit No. 86 of 2002 whereby the learned court has rejected the applications filed under order 1rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondents. Perused the impugned order as well as other materials placed on record. On perusal of the impugned order it appears that the court below has considered the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and specific finding has been recorded while dealing with the said application that the property i.e. khata No. 58 claimed by the present petitioners is not in any way concerned about the subject matter of the suit property. Both properties are different and it has been specifically recorded by the court belowthat even the plaintiff- respondent is not claiming any thing in respect of the suit property. The plaintiff is claiming suit land bearing Khata no. 79.. Thus the property i.e. khata No. 58 claimed by the present petitioners is not in any way concerned about the subject matter of the suit property. Thus the present petitioners are unable to make out a case to entertain this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. This Court is of the view that the learned court below has not committed any jurisdictional error in passing the impugned order and therefore the present petition deserves to be dismissed. The ad-interim order that has been passed on 2.7.2007 is ordered to be vacated. If the petitioners wants to claim any right,title and interest in the respect of suit property claimed by them against the respondents then in that case they can file separate suit claiming right,title and interest in respect of the same. (P.P.Bhatt,J) SD

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Sajjad and anr vs Md.Taiyab Same Subject Land Acquisition