Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sethi Alias Bikaash Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Sethi Alias Bikaash Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Feb 05, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971538

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sethi Alias Bikaash Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a.no.91 of 2013 sethi @ bikash kumar @ sethi bikash kumar. ... ...petitioner -versus- the state of jharkhand. ... ... ...opp. party ---------- coram: the honble mr. justice d.n.upadhyay for the petitioner: mr. ranjan kumar, advocate. for the state: a.p.p. ---------- 02/ 05.02.2013 the petitioner is an accused in a case registered under sections 25(1- b)a/26/35 of the arms act. it reveals that the informant proceeded for investigation in connection with adityapur (r.i.t.) p.s. case no.222 of 2012 in which accused jitendra sharma and others were named. on way, considering suspicious activity of some of the accused they were chased and jitendra sharma and sanup singh were apprehended by the police. on search, they were found in possession of live cartridges. the apprehended accused disclosed the name of present petitioner, who was also involved in the earlier case no.221 of 2012. it is submitted that the petitioner was neither apprehended on the spot nor anything incriminating material has been recovered from his possession and the similarly situated one of the accused-roushan kumar has been granted bail by this court on 16.01.2013 vide b.a.no.10221 of 2012. counsel for the state has opposed the prayer. submissions made by learned counsel find support from the documents placed before me. in the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the c.j.m., seraikella in connection with adityapur (r.i.t.) p.s. case no. 222 of 2012, corresponding to g.r.no.775 of 2012. [d.n.upadhyay,j.] p.k.s.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A.No.91 of 2013 Sethi @ Bikash Kumar @ Sethi Bikash Kumar. ... ...Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ...Opp. Party ---------- CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Petitioner: Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. ---------- 02/ 05.02.2013 The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 25(1- b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act. It reveals that the informant proceeded for investigation in connection with Adityapur (R.I.T.) P.S. Case No.222 of 2012 in which accused Jitendra Sharma and others were named. On way, considering suspicious activity of some of the accused they were chased and Jitendra Sharma and Sanup Singh were apprehended by the police. On search, they were found in possession of live cartridges. The apprehended accused disclosed the name of present petitioner, who was also involved in the earlier case No.221 of 2012. It is submitted that the petitioner was neither apprehended on the spot nor anything incriminating material has been recovered from his possession and the similarly situated one of the accused-Roushan Kumar has been granted bail by this Court on 16.01.2013 vide B.A.No.10221 of 2012. Counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Submissions made by learned Counsel find support from the documents placed before me. In the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Seraikella in connection with Adityapur (R.I.T.) P.S. Case No. 222 of 2012, corresponding to G.R.No.775 of 2012. [D.N.Upadhyay,J.] P.K.S.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial