Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Deepak Das Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Deepak Das vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Feb 05, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971485

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepak Das

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi b.a.no.709of2013 deepakdas .... .... . petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand .... .... .... opp.party coram:hon'blemrs.justicejayaroy forthepetitioner :mr.k.p.choudhary,advocate fortheopp.party :a.p.p. 02/05.02.2013 heard counsel appearingforthepetitionerandcounsel appearingforthestate. petitioner is an accused in this case registered under sections498a/341/323/494/384/406/34oftheindianpenalcode. counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that thoughthef.i.r.hasbeenlodgedundertheaforesaidsectionsbutthe court below has taken cognizance only under sections 498a/341/323/394/494oftheindianpenalcode.itisalsosubmitted thatthereisnospecificallegationagainstthepetitioner.petitioneris thehusbandandheisincustodysince26.09.2012i.e.morethanfour months. counselappearingforthestatehasnotdisputedtheperiod ofcustodyofthepetitioner. consideringthesubmissionsmadebyboththepartiesand andconsideringtheperiodofcustodyofthepetitioner,thepetitioner, abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedonbail,onfurnishingbailbond ofrs.10,000/(rs.tenthousand)withtwosuretiesoflikeamount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, jamshedpur in connection with jugsalai (bagbera) p.s. case no. 174 of 2012 correspondingtog.r.no.1346of2012withtheconditionsthatoneof thebailorswillbelocalresidenthavingimmovablepropertywithinthe jurisdictionofdistrictconcernedandthepetitionerwillremainpresent beforethetrialcourtatleastonceinamonthonthedatefixedfortrial tilltheconclusionoftrial. (jayaroy,j.) anit

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.709of2013 DeepakDas .... .... . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... .... Opp.Party CORAM:HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.K.P.Choudhary,Advocate FortheOpp.Party :A.P.P. 02/05.02.2013 Heard counsel appearingforthepetitionerandcounsel appearingfortheState. Petitioner is an accused in this case registered under Sections498A/341/323/494/384/406/34oftheIndianPenalCode. Counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that thoughtheF.I.R.hasbeenlodgedundertheaforesaidSectionsbutthe Court below has taken cognizance only under Sections 498A/341/323/394/494oftheIndianPenalCode.Itisalsosubmitted thatthereisnospecificallegationagainstthepetitioner.Petitioneris thehusbandandheisincustodysince26.09.2012i.e.morethanfour months. CounselappearingfortheStatehasnotdisputedtheperiod ofcustodyofthepetitioner. Consideringthesubmissionsmadebyboththepartiesand andconsideringtheperiodofcustodyofthepetitioner,thepetitioner, abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedonbail,onfurnishingbailbond ofRs.10,000/(Rs.Tenthousand)withtwosuretiesoflikeamount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in connection with Jugsalai (Bagbera) P.S. Case No. 174 of 2012 correspondingtoG.R.No.1346of2012withtheconditionsthatoneof thebailorswillbelocalresidenthavingimmovablepropertywithinthe jurisdictionofdistrictconcernedandthepetitionerwillremainpresent beforethetrialCourtatleastonceinamonthonthedatefixedfortrial tilltheconclusionoftrial. (JayaRoy,J.) Anit

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial