V.Saravanan Vs. 1.State Rep.by

V.Saravanan vs 1.State Rep.by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 11, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/964957

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/964957
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: M.Jaichandren
Decided On: Jan 11, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.Saravanan

Respondent

1.State Rep.by

Excerpt

.....manapparai, trichy district. 3.the tahsildar, manapparai taluk, trichy district. ... respondents petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents, their servants, men and agents from dispossessing the petitioner from the property situated at s.no.837, door no.80, nehruji nagar, manapparaipatty road, manapparai, trichy without following due process of law. !for petitioner ... mr.s.vinayak ^for respondents ... mr.k.p.krishnadass government advocate :order (order of the court was made by m.jaichandren, j) this writ petition has been filed praying that this court may be pleased, to issue a writ of mandamus, to forbear the respondents from dispossessing the petitioner, relating to the property, situated at s.no.837, door no.80, nehruji nagar, manapparaipatty road, manapparai, trichy, without following the due process of law. 2.mr.k.p.krishnadass, learned government advocate, had taken notice on behalf of the respondents and had submitted that no action is being taken to dispossess the petitioner relating to the property, situated at s.no.837, door no.80, nehruji nagar, manapparaipatty road, manapparai, trichy, at present.3. in view of the said statement made by the learned government advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondents, this court is of the view that no further orders are necessary in the present writ petition, at this stage. hence, the writ petition stands closed. the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. no costs. asvm to 1.the district collector, trichy district, trichy. 2.the commissioner, manapparai municipality, manapparai, trichy district. 3.the tahsildar, manapparai taluk, trichy district.

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:

11. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.818 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 V.Saravanan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State rep.by The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Commissioner, Manapparai Municipality, Manapparai, Trichy District. 3.The Tahsildar, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents, their servants, men and agents from dispossessing the petitioner from the property situated at S.No.837, Door No.80, Nehruji Nagar, Manapparaipatty Road, Manapparai, Trichy without following due process of law. !For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Vinayak ^For respondents ... Mr.K.P.Krishnadass Government Advocate :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J) This Writ Petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the respondents from dispossessing the petitioner, relating to the property, situated at S.No.837, Door No.80, Nehruji Nagar, Manapparaipatty Road, Manapparai, Trichy, without following the due process of law. 2.Mr.K.P.Krishnadass, learned Government Advocate, had taken notice on behalf of the respondents and had submitted that no action is being taken to dispossess the petitioner relating to the property, situated at S.No.837, Door No.80, Nehruji Nagar, Manapparaipatty Road, Manapparai, Trichy, at present.

3. In view of the said statement made by the learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondents, this Court is of the view that no further orders are necessary in the present Writ Petition, at this stage. Hence, the Writ Petition stands closed. The connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. asvm To 1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Commissioner, Manapparai Municipality, Manapparai, Trichy District. 3.The Tahsildar, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2013 Same Parties V.Saravanan vs 1.State Rep.by Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge M.Jaichandren