Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Maheshmoorth Vs. Chellapandy

Maheshmoorth vs Chellapandy

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 11, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/964956

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Maheshmoorth

Respondent

Chellapandy

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated:11. 01/2013 coram the honourable mr.justice g.rajasuria c.r.p.(pd)(md)no.2711 of 2012 and m.p.(md)no.1 of 2012 maheshmoorthi .. petitioner/petitioner/ 1st defendant vs chellapandy ... respondent/respondent/ plaintiff prayer petition filed under article 227 of the constitution of india, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 28.09.2012 passed in i.a.no.496 of 2012 in o.s.no.220 of 2008 on the file of the district munsif, nilakkottai. !for petitioner ... mr.n.vallinayagam ^for respondent ... mr.g.k.venkatraman * * * * * :order the civil revision petition has been filed to get set aside the order dated 28.09.2012 passed in i.a.no.496 of 2012 in o.s.no.220 of 2008, by the learned district munsif, nilakkottai.2. heard both sides.3. at the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff in all fairness would submit that his client is not having any objection for i.a.no.496 of 2012 being allowed on nominal terms for the purpose of p.w.1 being recalled and cross-examined by the revision petitioner/first defendant's counsel.4. accordingly, i.a.no.496 of 2012 is allowed, subject to the payment of costs of rs.300/-(rupees three hundred only) payable by the revision petitioner to the plaintiff within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. whereupon, the revision petitioner/first defendant shall have the liberty to cross-examine p.w.1.5. with the above observations, this civil revision petition is disposed of. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. no costs. ssl to the court of district munsif, nilakkottai.

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:

11. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2711 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 Maheshmoorthi .. Petitioner/Petitioner/ 1st Defendant Vs Chellapandy ... Respondent/Respondent/ Plaintiff Prayer Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 28.09.2012 passed in I.A.No.496 of 2012 in O.S.No.220 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif, Nilakkottai. !For Petitioner ... Mr.N.Vallinayagam ^For Respondent ... Mr.G.K.Venkatraman * * * * * :ORDER The Civil Revision Petition has been filed to get set aside the order dated 28.09.2012 passed in I.A.No.496 of 2012 in O.S.No.220 of 2008, by the learned District Munsif, Nilakkottai.

2. Heard both sides.

3. At the time of hearing, the learned Counsel for the respondent/plaintiff in all fairness would submit that his client is not having any objection for I.A.No.496 of 2012 being allowed on nominal terms for the purpose of P.W.1 being recalled and cross-examined by the revision petitioner/first defendant's Counsel.

4. Accordingly, I.A.No.496 of 2012 is allowed, subject to the payment of costs of Rs.300/-(Rupees Three Hundred Only) payable by the revision petitioner to the plaintiff within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Whereupon, the revision petitioner/first defendant shall have the liberty to cross-examine P.W.1.

5. With the above observations, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. ssl To The Court of District Munsif, Nilakkottai.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial