A.Siria Pushpam Vs. K.Devarajan

A.Siria Pushpam vs K.Devarajan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 23, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/964414

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/964414
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: M.Jaichandren
Decided On: Apr 23, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.Siria Pushpam

Respondent

K.Devarajan

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madras dated:23. 4.2013 coram the hon'ble mr.justice m.jaichandren contempt petition no.690 of 2013 sr.a.siria pushpam .. petitioner vs. mr.k.devarajan the director of school education college road chenna”006. .. respondent the contempt petition has been filed under section 10 & 12 of the contempt of courts act, 70/71, to punish the respondent for their willful disobedience of the order made in w.p.no.25295 of 2009 dated 25.7.2012. for petitioner : mr.k.sathish kumar for respondents : mr.s.gunasekaran government advocate o r d e r at this stage of the hearing of the contempt petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had submitted that the request made by the petitioner, for the grant of approval of her appointment, as a junior assistant, in the fourth respondent school, with effect from 21.1.2004, had been rejected by the first respondent, by his proceedings, dated 17.4.2013.2. in view of the said submissions, this court is of the view that no further orders are necessary in the present contempt petition. however, it is made clear that it would be open to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings of the first respondent, dated 17.4.2013, if so advised, in the manner known to law. no costs. 23.4.2013 lan index : yes/no internet : yes/no to: mr.k.devarajan the director of school education college road chenna”006. m.jaichandren j., lan contempt petition no.690 o”23. 4.2013

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:

23. 4.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Contempt Petition No.690 of 2013 Sr.A.Siria Pushpam .. Petitioner vs. Mr.K.Devarajan The Director of School Education College Road Chenna”

006. .. Respondent The Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 10 & 12 of The Contempt of Courts Act, 70/71, to punish the respondent for their willful disobedience of the order made in W.P.No.25295 of 2009 dated 25.7.2012. For petitioner : Mr.K.Sathish Kumar For respondents : Mr.S.Gunasekaran Government Advocate O R D E R At this stage of the hearing of the contempt petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had submitted that the request made by the petitioner, for the grant of approval of her appointment, as a Junior Assistant, in the fourth respondent School, with effect from 21.1.2004, had been rejected by the first respondent, by his proceedings, dated 17.4.2013.

2. In view of the said submissions, this Court is of the view that no further orders are necessary in the present contempt petition. However, it is made clear that it would be open to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings of the first respondent, dated 17.4.2013, if so advised, in the manner known to law. No costs. 23.4.2013 lan INDEX : YES/NO INTERNET : YES/NO To: Mr.K.Devarajan The Director of School Education College Road Chenna”

006. M.JAICHANDREN J., lan Contempt Petition No.690 o”

23. 4.2013

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2013 Same Parties A.Siria Pushpam vs K.Devarajan Same Subject Education Same Judge M.Jaichandren