Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S.Kamalam Vs. the Branch Manager,

S.Kamalam vs The Branch Manager,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 10, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/964142

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Kamalam

Respondent

The Branch Manager,

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated:10. 01/2013 coram the honourable mr.justice k.ravichandrabaabu w.p(md)no.10169 of 2010 and m.p.(md)no.1 of 2010 s.kamalam ... petitioner vs. the branch manager, syndicate bank, nagercoil, kanyakumari district. ... respondent prayer writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying for a writ of mandamus, forbearing the respondent from withholding the monthly pension of the petitioner. !for petitioner ... mr.c.t.perumal ^for respondent ... mr.a.m.p.pugazhenthi :order the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition and accordingly, he has made an endorsement to that effect. 2.in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. no costs. er

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:

10. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P(MD)No.10169 of 2010 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2010 S.Kamalam ... Petitioner Vs. The Branch Manager, Syndicate Bank, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondent Prayer Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from withholding the monthly pension of the petitioner. !For Petitioner ... Mr.C.T.Perumal ^For Respondent ... Mr.A.M.P.Pugazhenthi :ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition and accordingly, he has made an endorsement to that effect. 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. er

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial