Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

United States Vs. Kesterson

United States vs Kesterson

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-09-1935
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/96085

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
296 U.S. 299
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

United States

Respondent

Kesterson

Excerpt

united states v. kesterson - 296 u.s. 299 (1935) u.s. supreme court united states v. kesterson, 296 u.s. 299 (1935) united states v. kesterson no. 46 submitted november 14, 1935 decided december 9, 1935 296 u.s. 299 certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the tenth circuit syllabus decided upon the authority of united states v. constantine, ante p. 296 u. s. 287 . 76 f.2d 913 affirmed. page 296 u. s. 300 certiorari to review a judgment reversing convictions of respondents for carrying on a liquor business contrary to state law without having paid the tax imposed by § 701 of the revenue act of 1926. mr. justice roberts delivered the opinion of the court. this case, like the case next preceding, involves the validity of § 701 of the revenue act of 1926. the circuit court of appeals reversed judgments of conviction under an indictment charging engaging in the business of a retail liquor dealer contrary to the laws of oklahoma on august 17, 1934. 8 f.supp. 680, 76 f.2d 913. for the reasons given in the opinion in no. 40, the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice brandeis, mr. justice stone, and mr. justice cardozo dissent for the reasons stated in mr. justice cardozo's opinion in united states v. constantine, ante, p. 296 u. s. 287 .

Full Judgment

United States v. Kesterson - 296 U.S. 299 (1935)
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Kesterson, 296 U.S. 299 (1935)

United States v. Kesterson

No. 46

Submitted November 14, 1935

Decided December 9, 1935

296 U.S. 299

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

SYLLABUS

Decided upon the authority of United States v. Constantine, ante p. 296 U. S. 287 .

76 F.2d 913 affirmed.

Page 296 U. S. 300

Certiorari to review a judgment reversing convictions of respondents for carrying on a liquor business contrary to state law without having paid the tax imposed by § 701 of the Revenue Act of 1926.

MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case, like the case next preceding, involves the validity of § 701 of the Revenue Act of 1926. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed judgments of conviction under an indictment charging engaging in the business of a retail liquor dealer contrary to the laws of Oklahoma on August 17, 1934. 8 F.Supp. 680, 76 F.2d 913.

For the reasons given in the opinion in No. 40, the judgment is

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS, MR. JUSTICE STONE, and MR. JUSTICE CARDOZO dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE CARDOZO's opinion in United States v. Constantine, ante, p. 296 U. S. 287 .

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial