Jai Pal Vs. Uoi

Jai Pal vs Uoi

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 22, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/956057

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/956057
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: V.K.Shali
Decided On: Mar 22, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jai Pal

Respondent

Uoi

Excerpt

* high court of delhi at new delhi + r.s.a. no.221/2003 decided on :22. d march, 2013 jai pal through: appellants counsel for the appellant (appearance not given). versus uoi respondent coram: honble mr. justice v.k. shali v.k. shali, j.(oral) review petition no.173/13 & cm. no.5081/13 1. this is an application for reviewing order dated 7th february, 2013.2. i have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. i have also gone through the impugned order. since the learned counsel for the appellant has failed to show any error apparent on the face of record in the impugned order, therefore, the application for review of order dated 7th february, 2013 is rejected. since the review application has been rejected, the stay application is also dismissed. v.k. shali, j.march 22 2013 ss

Full Judgment

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. NO.221/2003 Decided on :

22. d March, 2013 JAI PAL Through: Appellants Counsel for the appellant (appearance not given). Versus UOI Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.

(Oral) Review Petition No.173/13 & CM. No.5081/13 1. This is an application for reviewing order dated 7th February, 2013.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. I have also gone through the impugned order. Since the learned counsel for the appellant has failed to show any error apparent on the face of record in the impugned order, therefore, the application for review of order dated 7th February, 2013 is rejected. Since the review application has been rejected, the stay application is also dismissed. V.K. SHALI, J.

MARCH 22 2013 ss

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2013 Same Parties Jai Pal vs Uoi Same Subject Education Same Judge V.K.Shali