Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mccormick Vs. Burnet

Mccormick vs Burnet

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1931
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/95512

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
283 U.S. 784
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mccormick

Respondent

Burnet

Excerpt

mccormick v. burnet - 283 u.s. 784 (1931) u.s. supreme court mccormick v. burnet, 283 u.s. 784 (1931) 283 u.s. 784 cyrus h. mc cormick et al., executors of the last will and testament of nettie fowler mccormick, deceased, pettio ners, v. david burnet, commissioner of internal revenue. no. 542. supreme court of the united states march 2, 1931 mr. robert n. miller, of washington, d. c., for petitioner. the attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the question in this case is that of the construction of section 402( c) of the revenue act of 1921, c. 136, 42 stat. 227, 278, a provision similar to that of section 402(c) of the revenue act of 1918, c. 18, 40 stat. 1057, 1097, which has already been construed by this court, and, in this view, there being no question of the constitutional anthority of the congress to impose prospectively a tax with respect to transfers or trusts of the sort here involved, the judgment of the united states circuit court of appeals for the seventh circuit (43 f.(2d) 277) is reversed upon the authority of may v. heiner, 281 u.s. 238 , 50 s. ct. 286, 67 a. l. r. 1244.

Full Judgment

MCCORMICK v. BURNET - 283 U.S. 784 (1931)
U.S. Supreme Court MCCORMICK v. BURNET, 283 U.S. 784 (1931)

283 U.S. 784

Cyrus H. Mc CORMICK et al., executors of the Last Will and Testament of Nettie Fowler McCormick, deceased, pettio ners,
v.
David BURNET, Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
No. 542.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 2, 1931

Mr. Robert N. Miller, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

The Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The question in this case is that of the construction of section 402( c) of the revenue act of 1921, c. 136, 42 Stat. 227, 278, a provision similar to that of section 402(c) of the Revenue Act of 1918, c. 18, 40 Stat. 1057, 1097, which has already been construed by this Court, and, in this view, there being no question of the constitutional anthority of the Congress to impose prospectively a tax with respect to transfers or trusts of the sort here involved, the judgment of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (43 F.(2d) 277) is reversed upon the authority of May v. Heiner, 281 U.S. 238 , 50 S. Ct. 286, 67 A. L. R. 1244.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial