Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Carr Vs. Zaja

Carr vs Zaja

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-23-1931
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/95442

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
283 U.S. 52
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Carr

Respondent

Zaja

Excerpt

carr v. zaja - 283 u.s. 52 (1931) u.s. supreme court carr v. zaja, 283 u.s. 52 (1931) carr v. zaja no. 125 argued march 2, 1931 decided march 23, 1931 283 u.s. 52 certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the ninth circuit syllabus 1. alien held liable to deportation, on the authority of philippides v. day, ante, p. 283 u. s. 48 . 2. jurisdiction of this court to review a judgment of the circuit court of appeal is not defeated by the fact that the mandate of that court was issued and spread upon the record of the district court. 37 f.2d 1016 reversed. certiorari, 282 u.s. 816, to review a judgment sustaining an order discharging zaja on habeas corpus. mr. justice holmes delivered the opinion of the court. this case raises the same question as no. 92, ante, p. 283 u. s. 48 , but, as stated in no. 92, was decided the other way by the circuit court of appeals for the ninth circuit. zaja is a dalmatian, citizen of jugo-slavia. he shipped as a seaman upon an italian ship and on its arrival at san pedro, california, deserted the ship on january 25, 1925. he was arrested on october 4, 1928, more than three years after his entry, and after a hearing was ordered to be deported on the same ground as in no. 92. he obtained a page 283 u. s. 53 writ of habeas corpus, and was ordered to be discharged from custody. 37 f.2d 1016. the judgment must be reversed for the reasons given in no. 92. it is objected that the mandate of the circuit court of appeals was not stayed, but was issued to the district court and spread upon its records, and that therefore the case is finished. but that does not defeat the jurisdiction of this court. the conqueror, 166 u. s. 110 , 166 u. s. 113 ; louisville & nashville r. co. v. behlmore, 169 u. s. 644 , 169 u. s. 648 . rule 45. judgment reversed.

Full Judgment

Carr v. Zaja - 283 U.S. 52 (1931)
U.S. Supreme Court Carr v. Zaja, 283 U.S. 52 (1931)

Carr v. Zaja

No. 125

Argued March 2, 1931

Decided March 23, 1931

283 U.S. 52

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SYLLABUS

1. Alien held liable to deportation, on the authority of Philippides v. Day, ante, p. 283 U. S. 48 .

2. Jurisdiction of this Court to review a judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeal is not defeated by the fact that the mandate of that court was issued and spread upon the record of the district court.

37 F.2d 1016 reversed.

Certiorari, 282 U.S. 816, to review a judgment sustaining an order discharging Zaja on habeas corpus.

MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case raises the same question as No. 92, ante, p. 283 U. S. 48 , but, as stated in No. 92, was decided the other way by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Zaja is a Dalmatian, citizen of Jugo-Slavia. He shipped as a seaman upon an Italian ship and on its arrival at San Pedro, California, deserted the ship on January 25, 1925. He was arrested on October 4, 1928, more than three years after his entry, and after a hearing was ordered to be deported on the same ground as in No. 92. He obtained a

Page 283 U. S. 53

writ of habeas corpus, and was ordered to be discharged from custody. 37 F.2d 1016. The judgment must be reversed for the reasons given in No. 92. It is objected that the mandate of the circuit court of appeals was not stayed, but was issued to the district court and spread upon its records, and that therefore the case is finished. But that does not defeat the jurisdiction of this Court. The Conqueror, 166 U. S. 110 , 166 U. S. 113 ; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Behlmore, 169 U. S. 644 , 169 U. S. 648 . Rule 45.

Judgment reversed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial