Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sadiq Vs. Shakeel Mohammed

Sadiq vs Shakeel Mohammed

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Jan 02, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/953348

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
H.R.R.P. No. 163 of 2012
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Karnataka Rent Act - Section - 46(1); Comparative Citation: 2013 (1) KCCR 151

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sadiq

Respondent

Shakeel Mohammed

Excerpt

karnataka rent act - section - 46(1); comparative citation: 2013 (1) kccr 151(prayer: this h.r.r.p. is filed u/s 46(1) of karnataka rent act, against the judgement and decree dated 3.10.2012 passed in hrc no.10079/2011 on the file of xv additional judge, court of small causes, bangalore, allowing the petition filed u/s 27(2)(a)(o) and (r) of karnataka rent act.) order revision petitioner and his counsel are present. revision respondent and his counsel are present. joint memo is filed. the joint memo reads as follows: "the parties have settled the above matter at the instance of this hon'ble court under the following terms: 1. the petitioner has requested to quit, vacate and hand over vacant possession on or before 30.6.2014 (thirty june two thousand and fourteen). 2. the petitioner has agreed to pay the rent on or before 10th of every month. 3. the petitioner has no objection for the respondent to withdraw the rents deposited before the trial court and this hon'ble court. 4. the petitioner undertakes not to sublet the premises and also undertakes to pay the rents without committing any default. 5. the respondent has no objection to grant time to the petitioner. 6. the parties therefore pray that this hon'ble court be pleased to dispose the petition in the above terms in the interest of justice and equity. this revision petition is disposed of in terms of joint memo. as the main matter is disposed of, application for stay does not survive for consideration and the same is dismissed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: This H.R.R.P. is filed u/s 46(1) of Karnataka Rent Act, against the judgement and decree dated 3.10.2012 passed in HRC No.10079/2011 on the file of xv additional judge, court of small causes, Bangalore, allowing the petition filed u/s 27(2)(a)(o) and (r) of karnataka rent act.)

ORDER

Revision petitioner and his counsel are present. Revision respondent and his counsel are present. Joint memo is filed. The joint memo reads as follows:

"The parties have settled the above matter at the instance of this Hon'ble court under the following terms:

1. The petitioner has requested to quit, vacate and hand over vacant possession on or before 30.6.2014 (Thirty June Two Thousand and Fourteen).

2. The petitioner has agreed to pay the rent on or before 10th of every month.

3. The petitioner has no objection for the respondent to withdraw the rents deposited before the trial court and this Hon'ble court.

4. The petitioner undertakes not to sublet the premises and also undertakes to pay the rents without committing any default.

5. The respondent has no objection to grant time to the petitioner.

6. The parties therefore pray that this Hon'ble court be pleased to dispose the petition in the above terms in the interest of justice and equity.

This revision petition is disposed of in terms of joint memo.

As the main matter is disposed of, application for stay does not survive for consideration and the same is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial