Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Prashanth Rajan Vs. Manager, New India Assurance Co., Ltd. and Another

Prashanth Rajan vs Manager, New India Assurance Co., Ltd. and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Jan 04, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/953323

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Misc. Civil 10750 of 2010 in M.F.A. No. 6125 of 2010 (MV)
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Limitation Act - Section 5; Comparative Citation: 2013 (1) KCCR 440

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prashanth Rajan

Respondent

Manager, New India Assurance Co., Ltd. and Another

Excerpt

limitation act - section 5; comparative citation: 2013 (1) kccr 440(this misc.cvl. is filed under section 5 of the limitation act, praying to condone the delay of 357 days in filing the above appeal, in the interest of justice and equity.) 1. this misc.cvl. is filed by the counsel for appellant, for condoning the delay of 357 days in filing the appeal. 2. i have heard learned counsel appearing for appellant and learned counsel appearing for insurer. 3. the delay in filing the appeal has been satisfactorily explained by showing sufficient cause and the same is accepted. for the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanying the application, this misc.cvl. is allowed. delay of 357 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the appellant shall not be entitled to any interest for the said period, if he succeeds in the appeal.

Full Judgment

(This Misc.Cvl. is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, praying to condone the delay of 357 days in filing the above appeal, in the interest of justice and equity.)

1. This Misc.Cvl. is filed by the counsel for Appellant, for condoning the delay of 357 days in filing the appeal.

2. I have heard learned counsel appearing for appellant and learned counsel appearing for Insurer.

3. The delay in filing the appeal has been satisfactorily explained by showing sufficient cause and the same is accepted. For the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanying the application, this Misc.Cvl. is allowed. Delay of 357 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the appellant shall not be entitled to any interest for the said period, if he succeeds in the appeal.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 2013 Same Parties Prashanth Rajan vs Manager, New India Assurance Co., Ltd. and... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge N.K. Patil
Land Acquisition

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales