Ashok Digar. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Ashok Digar. vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jan 16, 2006

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/952852

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/952852
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Judge: N. Dhinakar, J.
Decided On: Jan 16, 2006
Case Number: Cr. Revn 288 of 2005
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 125, 401

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ashok Digar.

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Legal References

Acts: Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 125, 401
Reported In: 2006CriLJ1881; 2006(1)EASTCRIC417; AIR2006(1)JHAR621; 2006(2)DMC252

Excerpt

judgment(1.) the petitioner was ordered to pay a sum of rs. l.000/- as maintenance under section 125 cr. p. c. to sunlta devi who is his wife and o. p. no. 2 in this revision aggrieved by the said order passed by the family court the present revision is filed.(2.) the o. p. no 2 was married on 29-4-2002 to the petitioner and thereafter she was living in the house of the petitioner. according to o. p. no 2 as she was subjected to cruelty and torture by the petitioner she left her matrimonial home and that the petitioner has failed and neglected to maintain her. when the petition was filed with the above averment it was taken on file. on notice being served the petitioner appeared before the family court. he denied the allegation but the family court, finding that the case of the o. p. no. 2 sunita devi to be true, directed the petitioner to pay a sum of rs. 1000/- p.m as maintenance(3.) on going through the order 1 find no irregularity or illegality in the same. the revision is therefore, dismissed as devoid of merit. petition dismissed.

Full Judgment

JUDGMENT

(1.) The petitioner was ordered to pay a sum of Rs. l.000/- as maintenance under Section 125 Cr. P. C. to Sunlta Devi who is his wife and O. P. No. 2 in this revision Aggrieved by the said order passed by the Family Court the present revision is filed.

(2.) The O. P. No 2 was married on 29-4-2002 to the petitioner and thereafter she was living in the house of the petitioner. According to O. P. No 2 as she was subjected to cruelty and torture by the petitioner she left her matrimonial home and that the petitioner has failed and neglected to maintain her. When the petition was filed with the above averment it was taken on file. On notice being served the petitioner appeared before the Family Court. He denied the allegation but the Family Court, finding that the case of the O. P. No. 2 Sunita Devi to be true, directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 1000/- p.m as maintenance

(3.) On going through the order 1 find no irregularity or illegality in the same. The revision is therefore, dismissed as devoid of merit. Petition dismissed.

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2006 Same Parties Ashok Digar. vs State of Jharkhand Same Subject Criminal Same Judge N. Dhinakar, J. Acts & Sections Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 125, 401