Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Alpha Steamship Corp. Vs. Cain

Alpha Steamship Corp. vs Cain

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-26-1930
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/95222

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
281 U.S. 642
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Alpha Steamship Corp.

Respondent

Cain

Excerpt

.....the vessel, and the other petitioners were in possession of her. respondent sued petitioners in the federal court for the southern district of new york to recover damages for personal injuries caused by an assault upon him by his superior, one jackson, an assistant engineer in charge of the engine room. the complaint charged and the evidence was sufficient to warrant a finding that jackson was authorized by defendants to direct plaintiff about his page 281 u. s. 643 work and that, for the purpose of reprimanding him for tardiness and compelling him to work, jackson struck plaintiff with a wrench and seriously injured him. that was the basis of fact upon which the jury under the charge of the court was authorized to find for plaintiff. the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $12,000, and the judgment thereon was affirmed in the circuit court of appeals. that court expressed the opinion, 35 f.2d 717, 721, that § 33 of the merchant marine act, 46 u.s.c. § 688, and the federal employers' liability act, 45 u.s.c. §§ 51-59, did not apply, and held defendants liable under the general maritime law without regard to these acts. but, in jamison v. encarnacion, ante, p. 281 u. s. 635 , we hold that such an assault is negligence within the meaning of § 1 of the federal employers' liability act, which is made available to seamen by § 33 of the merchant marine act. the ruling in that case controls in this. we need not examine the grounds upon which the circuit court of appeals put its decision. judgment affirmed.

Full Judgment

Alpha Steamship Corp. v. Cain - 281 U.S. 642 (1930)
U.S. Supreme Court Alpha Steamship Corp. v. Cain, 281 U.S. 642 (1930)

Alpha Steamship Corp. v. Cain

No. 457

Argued April 29, 30, 1930

Decided May 26, 1930

281 U.S. 642

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SYLLABUS

An assault on a seaman by a superior authorized to direct his work and who committed the assault for the purpose of reprimanding him for tardiness and compelling him to work held negligence of the employer within the meaning of the federal Employers' Liability Act, and actionable against the employer under that Act as made applicable by the Merchant Marine Act. Jamison v. Encarnacion, ante p. 281 U. S. 635 .

35 F.2d 717 affirmed.

Certiorari, 280 U.S. 549, to review a judgment of the circuit court of appeals affirming a recovery by a seaman for injuries resulting from an assault committed upon him by a superior aboard ship.

MR. JUSTICE BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

Respondent was a seaman employed as a fireman on the American steamship Alpha navigating the high seas. The corporation petitioner owned and operated the vessel, and the other petitioners were in possession of her. Respondent sued petitioners in the federal court for the Southern District of New York to recover damages for personal injuries caused by an assault upon him by his superior, one Jackson, an assistant engineer in charge of the engine room. The complaint charged and the evidence was sufficient to warrant a finding that Jackson was authorized by defendants to direct plaintiff about his

Page 281 U. S. 643

work and that, for the purpose of reprimanding him for tardiness and compelling him to work, Jackson struck plaintiff with a wrench and seriously injured him. That was the basis of fact upon which the jury under the charge of the court was authorized to find for plaintiff. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $12,000, and the judgment thereon was affirmed in the circuit court of appeals.

That court expressed the opinion, 35 F.2d 717, 721, that § 33 of the Merchant Marine Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, and the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-59, did not apply, and held defendants liable under the general maritime law without regard to these acts. But, in Jamison v. Encarnacion, ante, p. 281 U. S. 635 , we hold that such an assault is negligence within the meaning of § 1 of the Federal Employers' Liability Act, which is made available to seamen by § 33 of the Merchant Marine Act. The ruling in that case controls in this. We need not examine the grounds upon which the circuit court of appeals put its decision.

Judgment affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial