Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Amarjeet Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Amarjeet Singh vs State of U.P. and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided May 25, 2011
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/951786

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.30785 of 2011
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Section 47(4-A) -

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amarjeet Singh

Respondent

State of U.P. and Others

Legal References

Reported In
2011AIR(All)157;

Excerpt

indian stamp act, 1899 - section 47(4-a) -pankaj mithal, j. in respect to instrument no.2319 of 2008 proceedings for determining deficiency in stamp duty were initiated. petitioner expressed willingness to deposit the deficiency provided no interest is levied. however, the collector moradabad vide order dated 15.11.2010 determined the deficiency and refused to waive the interest. against the aforesaid two orders the present writ petition has been filed only on the ground that as the petitioner has willingly deposited deficiency in stamp duty the interest directed to be charged be waived. section 47(4-a) of the indian stamp act, 1899 mandates the collector to demand simple interest @? one and a half percent per mansem on the amount of deficient stamp duty and the interest is payable from the date of execution of the instrument till the date of? actual payment of the deficient stamp duty. in view of above provision payment of interest on deficient stamp duty on account of delay? is mandatory. the mandate of a statutory provision for charging interest cannot be done away with when admittedly proper stamp duty had not been paid and the deficiency determined was made good later on. the petitioner had? approached this court earlier also by means of writ petition no. 2686 of 2011 and the said writ petition was dismissed vide order dated 18.1.2011 clearly holding that liability of interest is a statutory liability and this court cannot waive the liability. in view of aforesaid facts and circumstances as the interest liability is a statutory liability, the same cannot be waived and the petitioner is held liable to pay the interest at the specified rate from the execution of the instrument till the payment of the deficient stamp duty. no other point has been argued. writ petition has no merit and is dismissed.

Full Judgment

Pankaj Mithal, J.

In respect to Instrument No.2319 of 2008 proceedings for determining deficiency in stamp duty were initiated. Petitioner expressed willingness to deposit the deficiency provided no interest is levied. However, the Collector Moradabad vide order dated 15.11.2010 determined the deficiency and refused to waive the interest.

Against the aforesaid two orders the present writ petition has been filed only on the ground that as the petitioner has willingly deposited deficiency in stamp duty the interest directed to be charged be waived.

Section 47(4-A) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 mandates the Collector to demand simple interest @? one and a half percent per mansem on the amount of deficient stamp duty and the interest is payable from the date of execution of the instrument till the date of? actual payment of the deficient stamp duty.

In view of above provision payment of interest on deficient stamp duty on account of delay? is mandatory.

The mandate of a statutory provision for charging interest cannot be done away with when admittedly proper stamp duty had not been paid and the deficiency determined was made good later on.

The petitioner had? approached this court earlier also by means of Writ Petition No. 2686 of 2011 and the said writ petition was dismissed vide order dated 18.1.2011 clearly holding that liability of interest is a statutory liability and this court cannot waive the liability.

In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances as the interest liability is a statutory liability, the same cannot be waived and the petitioner is held liable to pay the interest at the specified rate from the execution of the instrument till the payment of the deficient stamp duty.

No other point has been argued.

Writ Petition has no merit and is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial