Shiva Naik Vs. Devidas Satappa Telgi, S/O. Satappa Telgi and Others

Shiva Naik vs Devidas Satappa Telgi, S/O. Satappa Telgi and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Goa Decided Jun 20, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/949729

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/949729
Court: Mumbai Goa High Court
Judge: F.M. Reis
Decided On: Jun 20, 2012
Case Number: CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.12 OF 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shiva Naik

Respondent

Devidas Satappa Telgi, S/O. Satappa Telgi and Others

Excerpt

oral judgment: heard shri j.j. mulgaonkar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. admit. 3. heard forthwith. 4. the above petition challenges the order passed by the learned registrar dated 15/03/2012 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner came to be dismissed for non-payment of process fees to serve the unserved respondents. 5. during the course of the hearing of the above petition shri j.j. mulgaonkar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner undertakes to pay the requisite process fees within two weeks from today. 6. considering the said statement of the learned counsel and in the interest of justice the impugned order dated 15/03/2012 passed by the learned registrar deserves to be quashed and set aside. 7. in view of the above, i pass the following order:order (i) the impugned order dated 15/03/2012 passed by the learned registrar is quashed and set aside. (ii) first appeal no.3/2011 is restored to the file. (iii) petitioner is permitted to pay the process fees to serve the unserved respondents within three weeks from today. (iv) petition stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

Oral Judgment:

Heard Shri J.J. Mulgaonkar, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. Admit.

3. Heard forthwith.

4. The above petition challenges the order passed by the learned Registrar dated 15/03/2012 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner came to be dismissed for non-payment of process fees to serve the unserved respondents.

5. During the course of the hearing of the above petition Shri J.J. Mulgaonkar, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner undertakes to pay the requisite process fees within two weeks from today.

6. Considering the said statement of the learned Counsel and in the interest of justice the impugned order dated 15/03/2012 passed by the learned Registrar deserves to be quashed and set aside.

7. In view of the above, I pass the following order:

ORDER

(i) The impugned order dated 15/03/2012 passed by the learned Registrar is quashed and set aside.

(ii) First Appeal No.3/2011 is restored to the file.

(iii) Petitioner is permitted to pay the process fees to serve the unserved respondents within three weeks from today.

(iv) Petition stands disposed of.

Same Court & Year Mumbai Goa · 2012 Same Parties Shiva Naik vs Devidas Satappa Telgi, S/O. Satappa Telgi and O... Same Subject Education Same Judge F.M. Reis