Goa Foundation Vs. Goa State Pollution Control Board Through Its Member Secretary and Others

Goa Foundation vs Goa State Pollution Control Board Through Its Member Secretary and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Goa Decided Oct 04, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/949160

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/949160
Court: Mumbai Goa High Court
Judge: S.J. Vazifdar &Amp; U.V. Bakre
Decided On: Oct 04, 2012
Case Number: Pil Writ Petition No. 4 of 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Goa Foundation

Respondent

Goa State Pollution Control Board Through Its Member Secretary and Others

Excerpt

1. rule. rule is made returnable and heard forthwith. 2. the petitioner has filed an affidavit today, the contents of which indicate that their grievances stand redressed, at least, at this stage. the affidavit is taken on record. 3. the petitioner has challenged an order dated 29th november, 2011 which revoked an order dated 4th october, 2011, suspending the consents to operate issued in favour of respondent no.5. 4. the petitioner stated in paragraph 2 of the affidavit filed today that the consents to operate issued to respondent no.5 under certain enactments expired on 31st july, 2012 and the consents have not been renewed. in view thereof, as stated earlier, the petitioner's grievances stand redressed and, in any event, do not survive at this stage. needless to add, this is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, including respondent no.5 which has applied for renewal of the consents. 5. the petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to adopt proceedings, if necessary in future.

Full Judgment

1. Rule. Rule is made returnable and heard forthwith.

2. The petitioner has filed an affidavit today, the contents of which indicate that their grievances stand redressed, at least, at this stage. The affidavit is taken on record.

3. The petitioner has challenged an order dated 29^th November, 2011 which revoked an order dated 4th October, 2011, suspending the consents to operate issued in favour of respondent No.5.

4. The petitioner stated in paragraph 2 of the affidavit filed today that the consents to operate issued to respondent No.5 under certain enactments expired on 31st July, 2012 and the consents have not been renewed. In view thereof, as stated earlier, the petitioner's grievances stand redressed and, in any event, do not survive at this stage. Needless to add, this is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, including respondent No.5 which has applied for renewal of the consents.

5. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to adopt proceedings, if necessary in future.

Same Court & Year Mumbai Goa · 2012 Same Parties Goa Foundation vs Goa State Pollution Control Board Through I... Same Subject Education Same Judge S.J. Vazifdar &Amp; U.V. Bakre