Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rakesh Kumar Garg Vs. State and Others

Rakesh Kumar Garg vs State and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 30, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/948833

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.M.C. 1106 of 2012
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rakesh Kumar Garg

Respondent

State and Others

Excerpt

suresh kait suresh kait, j. (oral) crl. m.as 3907-08/2012 (exemption) allowed subject to all just exceptions. crl. m.c. 1106/2012 1. notice issued. 2. mr. navin sharma, learned app for state accepts notice on behalf of state. 3. with the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the instant petition is taken up today for final disposal. 4. ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that vide the instant petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of fir no. 228/2011, registered for the offences punishable under sections 498a/406/354/34 indian penal code, 1860 at p.s. ranhola on the complaint of respondent no.2/complainant against the petitioner. 5. further submits that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties and petitioner and respondent no.2 are living happily as husband and wife. in view of amicable settlement arrived at between the parties and in view of the fact that both are residing together as husband and wife, the above mentioned fir be quashed in the interest of justice. 6. respondent no.2 is present in the court today. she has been duly identified by io/si s.k. sharma. 7. respondent no.2 submits that she is happily residing together with her husband i.e petitioner in the instant petition. she has settled all the disputes with petitioner and has no objection if the fir is quashed. 8. ld. app for state submits that the investigation of the case is still pending and charge-sheet has not been filed in the trial court. 9. further submits that in view of the fact that both the parties are residing together as husband and wife, the instant petition be allowed in the interest of justice. 10. keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, statement of respondent no.2 and in the interest of justice, i hereby quash fir no. 228/2011, registered at p.s. ranhola and all the proceedings emanating therefrom. 11. crl. m.c. 1106/2012 is allowed on above terms. 12. dasti.

Full Judgment

SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

CRL. M.As 3907-08/2012 (Exemption)

Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CRL. M.C. 1106/2012

1. Notice issued.

2. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned APP for State accepts notice on behalf of State.

3. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the instant petition is taken up today for final disposal.

4. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that vide the instant petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of FIR No. 228/2011, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/354/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 at P.S. Ranhola on the complaint of respondent No.2/complainant against the petitioner.

5. Further submits that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties and petitioner and respondent No.2 are living happily as husband and wife. In view of amicable settlement arrived at between the parties and in view of the fact that both are residing together as husband and wife, the above mentioned FIR be quashed in the interest of justice.

6. Respondent No.2 is present in the court today. She has been duly identified by IO/SI S.K. Sharma.

7. Respondent No.2 submits that she is happily residing together with her husband i.e petitioner in the instant petition. She has settled all the disputes with petitioner and has no objection if the FIR is quashed.

8. Ld. APP for State submits that the investigation of the case is still pending and Charge-sheet has not been filed in the trial court.

9. Further submits that in view of the fact that both the parties are residing together as husband and wife, the instant petition be allowed in the interest of justice.

10. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, statement of respondent No.2 and in the interest of justice, I hereby quash FIR No. 228/2011, registered at P.S. Ranhola and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.

11. Crl. M.C. 1106/2012 is allowed on above terms.

12. Dasti.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial