Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pappu Vs. State and Others

Pappu vs State and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Feb 17, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/948454

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.M.C. 586 OF 2012
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pappu

Respondent

State and Others

Excerpt

suresh kait, j (oral) crl. m. a. no. 2059-2060/2012 exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. cms stand disposed of. crl.m.c. 586/2012 1. issue notice. 2. ms. navin sharma, learned app accepts notice on behalf of the state. 3. mr. m.k. upadhyay, advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents no.2 and 3. 4. with the consent of ld. counsels of the parties, the instant petition is taken up for disposal. 5. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide fir no. 179 dated 19.08.2009, case under sections 363 of indian penal code, 1860 was registered at p.s. welcome colony, delhi against the petitioner, on the complaint of respondent no.3. 6. learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties vide compromise deed dated 01.02.2012. he also submits that the complainant/ respondent no.3 is no more interested to pursue the case further and she has no objection if the above mentioned fir with all emanating proceedings thereto be quashed. 7. respondent no.3/complainant is present in person in the court today with her counsel named above. 8. on instruction, learned counsel for the respondents nos. 2 and 3 has submitted that since the petitioner and respondent no.2 are major and now married with each other, therefore, respondent no.3/complainant has no objection, if the fir is quashed. 9. keeping in view of the statement of respondent no.3, the fact that petitioner and respondent no.2 are married with each other and further they have blessed with male child, therefore, in the interest of justice, i quash the fir no. 179 dated 19.08.2009 registered at p.s. welcome colony with all the proceedings emanating therefrom. 10. criminal m.c. 586/2012 is disposed of. 11. dasti.

Full Judgment

SURESH KAIT, J

(Oral)

Crl. M. A. No. 2059-2060/2012

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CMs stand disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 586/2012

1. Issue notice.

2. Ms. Navin Sharma, learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.

3. Mr. M.K. Upadhyay, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3.

4. With the consent of ld. Counsels of the parties, the instant petition is taken up for disposal.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide FIR No. 179 dated 19.08.2009, case under Sections 363 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 was registered at P.S. Welcome Colony, Delhi against the petitioner, on the complaint of respondent No.3.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties vide compromise deed dated 01.02.2012. He also submits that the complainant/ respondent No.3 is no more interested to pursue the case further and she has no objection if the above mentioned FIR with all emanating proceedings thereto be quashed.

7. Respondent No.3/complainant is present in person in the Court today with her counsel named above.

8. On instruction, learned counsel for the respondents Nos. 2 and 3 has submitted that since the petitioner and respondent No.2 are major and now married with each other, therefore, respondent No.3/complainant has no objection, if the FIR is quashed.

9. Keeping in view of the statement of respondent No.3, the fact that petitioner and respondent No.2 are married with each other and further they have blessed with male child, therefore, in the interest of justice, I quash the FIR No. 179 dated 19.08.2009 registered at P.S. Welcome Colony with all the proceedings emanating therefrom.

10. Criminal M.C. 586/2012 is disposed of.

11. Dasti.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial