Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Maryland Vs. Soper

Maryland vs Soper

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-01-1926
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/94626

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
270 U.S. 44
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Maryland

Respondent

Soper

Excerpt

maryland v. soper - 270 u.s. 44 (1926) u.s. supreme court maryland v. soper , 270 u.s. 44 (1926) maryland v. soper (no. 3) no. 25, original argued december 7, 1925 decided february 1, 1926 270 u.s. 44 petition for a writ of mandamus syllabus decided upon the authority of maryland v. soper (no. 2), ante, p. 270 u. s. 36 . page 270 u. s. 45 mr. chief justice taft delivered the opinion of the court. this case is quite like that in no. 24, original, just decided. it differs in that here the indictment which was removed from the circuit court of harford county, maryland, to the district court of the united states for maryland, was an indictment against e. franklin ely for perjury, in the inquiry made by the coroner into the circumstances of the death of wenger, it being charged that when it was material whether he had seen lawrence wenger at the time he (ely), as a government officer, lay concealed and hidden and watched the bringing of the still, he falsely stated he had not seen wenger. in all other respects, the proceedings were quite like those in the case just decided, and, on the principles laid down in that case, we must hold that there was no ground for removing the prosecution of ely for perjury, and that the mandamus to require the remanding of the removal should be made absolute.

Full Judgment

Maryland v. Soper - 270 U.S. 44 (1926)
U.S. Supreme Court Maryland v. Soper , 270 U.S. 44 (1926)

Maryland v. Soper (No. 3)

No. 25, Original

Argued December 7, 1925

Decided February 1, 1926

270 U.S. 44

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

SYLLABUS

Decided upon the authority of Maryland v. Soper (No. 2), ante, p. 270 U. S. 36 .

Page 270 U. S. 45

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is quite like that in No. 24, Original, just decided. It differs in that here the indictment which was removed from the Circuit Court of Harford County, Maryland, to the District Court of the United States for Maryland, was an indictment against E. Franklin Ely for perjury, in the inquiry made by the coroner into the circumstances of the death of Wenger, it being charged that when it was material whether he had seen Lawrence Wenger at the time he (Ely), as a government officer, lay concealed and hidden and watched the bringing of the still, he falsely stated he had not seen Wenger. In all other respects, the proceedings were quite like those in the case just decided, and, on the principles laid down in that case, we must hold that there was no ground for removing the prosecution of Ely for perjury, and that the mandamus to require the remanding of the removal should be made absolute.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial