Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Atma Singh Vs. Emperor

Atma Singh vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Privy Council Decided Jul 23, 1945
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/945701

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Privy Council
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Privy Council Appeal No. 14 of 1945 (From Lahore)
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Atma Singh

Advocate G.S. Rewcastle and K.V. Krishna Menon for Appellant; G.D. Roberts and S.P. Khambatta for the Crown. Solicitors for Appellant, Stanley Johnson and Allen; Solicitors for the Crown Solicitor, India Office.

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1946PC12

Excerpt

lord thankerton: in the present appeal it appears now that the appellant, while challenging the evidence of the approver, does not in any way challenge the findings of the court with regard to the search for, and recovery of, a revolver and its connexion with the accused and with the crime. that being so, it seems to their lordships unnecessary to go any further into a consideration of the approver's evidence because if it is set aside it is clear that there has been no serious miscarriage of justice, there being amply sufficient evidence in the findings with regard to the revolver, taken along with the dying declaration of the deceased and the evidence of the deceased's elder son, so far as they go, in corroboration of the circumstances. that being so, their lordships cannot do otherwise than humbly advise his majesty that this appeal should be dismissed. appeal dismissed.

Full Judgment

Lord Thankerton:

In the present appeal it appears now that the appellant, while challenging the evidence of the approver, does not in any way challenge the findings of the Court with regard to the search for, and recovery of, a revolver and its connexion with the accused and with the crime. That being so, it seems to their Lordships unnecessary to go any further into a consideration of the approver's evidence because if it is set aside it is clear that there has been no serious miscarriage of justice, there being amply sufficient evidence in the findings with regard to the revolver, taken along with the dying declaration of the deceased and the evidence of the deceased's elder son, so far as they go, in corroboration of the circumstances. That being so, their Lordships cannot do otherwise than humbly advise His Majesty that this appeal should be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial