Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cce, Puducherry Vs. M/S. Bayer Material Science (P) Ltd

Cce, Puducherry vs M/S. Bayer Material Science (P) Ltd

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai Decided Sep 03, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/944291

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Appeal No. ST/403 of 2010
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cce, Puducherry

Advocate Shri T.H. Rao, SDR for the Appellant. Shri V. Ravindran, Advocate for the Respondents.

Respondent

M/S. Bayer Material Science (P) Ltd

Excerpt

1. the commissioner (appeals) has set aside the demand of service tax on the ground that the tax was paid by the goods transport agency and therefore the question of payment once again on same services did not arise. he has also set aside the penalty imposed on the assessee. this is why the revenue is in appeal before the tribunal. 2. i have heard both sides. the commissioner (appeals) has relied upon the decision of the tribunal in navyug alloys pvt. ltd. vs. cce, vadodara - 2009 (13) str 421 to hold that the assessee is not required to pay service tax once again. no contrary decision has been brought to my notice by the learned sdr. nor has the operation of the tribunal’s order been stayed or the order reversed by any superior forum. since the decision of the tribunal in navyug alloys (supra) is the only decision on this point, following the ratio of the same, i uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. The Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the demand of service tax on the ground that the tax was paid by the goods transport agency and therefore the question of payment once again on same services did not arise. He has also set aside the penalty imposed on the assessee. This is why the Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal.

2. I have heard both sides. The Commissioner (Appeals) has relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in Navyug Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE, Vadodara - 2009 (13) STR 421 to hold that the assessee is not required to pay service tax once again. No contrary decision has been brought to my notice by the learned SDR. Nor has the operation of the Tribunal’s order been stayed or the order reversed by any superior forum. Since the decision of the Tribunal in Navyug Alloys (supra) is the only decision on this point, following the ratio of the same, I uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial