Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore Vs. Indo Shell Cast (P) Ltd.

Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore vs indo Shell Cast (P) Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai Decided Apr 27, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/943677

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Appeal No.E/381 of 2009
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore

Advocate Shri T.H.Rao, SDR

Respondent

indo Shell Cast (P) Ltd.

Excerpt

the issue in dispute in the present appeal, namely, as to whether there can be a demand for interest on delayed payment of differential duty on account of price variation stands settled against the respondents herein by the apex court’s decision in the case of cce pune vs skf india ltd., [2009 (239) elt 385 (sc)]. following the ratio of the above decision, i set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal holding that the assessees be held to be liable to pay interest.

Full Judgment

The issue in dispute in the present appeal, namely, as to whether there can be a demand for interest on delayed payment of differential duty on account of price variation stands settled against the respondents herein by the apex court’s decision in the case of CCE Pune Vs SKF India Ltd., [2009 (239) ELT 385 (SC)]. Following the ratio of the above decision, I set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal holding that the assessees be held to be liable to pay interest.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial