Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry Vs. M/S.Consolidated Computer Services

Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry vs M/S.Consolidated Computer Services

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai Decided Nov 06, 2009

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/943452

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/943452
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Judge: The Honourable Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy, Technical Member &Amp; the Honourable Mr. P.K. Das, Judicial Member
Decided On: Nov 06, 2009
Case Number: Appeal No.E/1153 of 2003
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry

Advocate Shri C. Rangaraju, SDR

Respondent

M/S.Consolidated Computer Services

Excerpt

per dr. chittaranjan satapathy heard the learned sdr. the respondents are not represented despite notice. there is also no adjournment request. as such, the grounds of appeal taken by the department remain uncontroverted. accordingly, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the lower appellate authority for passing a fresh order after taking into account the grounds of appeal advanced by the department and after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the respondents.

Full Judgment

Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy

Heard the learned SDR. The respondents are not represented despite notice. There is also no adjournment request. As such, the grounds of appeal taken by the department remain uncontroverted. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the lower appellate authority for passing a fresh order after taking into account the grounds of appeal advanced by the department and after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the respondents.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chen... Same Parties Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry vs M/S.Consolidat... Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge The Honourable Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy, Technical Member &...