M/S. Cotonex Vs. Cce, Trichy

M/S. Cotonex vs Cce, Trichy

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai Decided Jan 07, 2010

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/942409

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/942409
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Judge: The Honourable Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy, Technical Member
Decided On: Jan 07, 2010
Case Number: E/COD/220 of 2009 & E/S/241 of 2009 and E/344 of 2009
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M/S. Cotonex

Advocate Shri R. Karthikeyan, Advocate for the Appellants. Shri T.H. Rao, SDR for the Respondent.

Respondent

Cce, Trichy

Excerpt

after hearing both sides the miscellaneous application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the tribunal is allowed and the requirement of predeposit is waived. 2. both sides admit that the appeal filed before the lower appellate authority was filed after a delay of 330 days which was beyond the condonable time limit prescribed under the law. as such, the lower appellate authority had no option but to dismiss the appeal. hence his order requires no interference. consequently the appeal filed before the tribunal is dismissed.

Full Judgment

After hearing both sides the miscellaneous application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal is allowed and the requirement of predeposit is waived.

2. Both sides admit that the appeal filed before the lower appellate authority was filed after a delay of 330 days which was beyond the condonable time limit prescribed under the law. As such, the lower appellate authority had no option but to dismiss the appeal. Hence his order requires no interference. Consequently the appeal filed before the Tribunal is dismissed.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chen... Same Parties M/S. Cotonex vs Cce, Trichy Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge The Honourable Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy, Technical Member