Sunil Kumar Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board Through Its Chairman, Delhi and Others

Sunil Kumar vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board Through Its Chairman, Delhi and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi Decided Nov 24, 2011

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/940271

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/940271
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Judge: The Honourable Mr. G. George Paracken, Judicial Member &Amp; the Honourable Dr. a.K. Mishra, Administrative Member
Decided On: Nov 24, 2011
Case Number: OA NO. 3931 of 2010
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunil Kumar

Advocate For the Applicants: Rohit Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Amit Anand, Advocate.

Respondent

Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board Through Its Chairman, Delhi and Others

Excerpt

hon’ble shri george paracken: 1. the issue raised in this oa has already been considered by this bench in ta-72/2010 and connected cases decided on 18.11.2011. the operative part of the said order reads as under: “19.we have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. in our considered view, since the division bench of the apex court in the case of state of uttaranchal (supra) has directed the registry of the apex court to place the matter before the hon’ble chief justice of india for constituting a larger bench, it will be in the fitness of things to adjourn this case sine die awaiting the decision of the larger bench to be so constituted. however, we make it clear that, if the decision of the larger bench when pronounced is in favour of the applicants, the respondents may, by themselves, grant relief sought by applicants in these transfer applications/original application.” 2. the aforesaid order will equally apply in the present case also.

Full Judgment

Hon’ble Shri George Paracken:

1. The issue raised in this OA has already been considered by this Bench in TA-72/2010 and connected cases decided on 18.11.2011. The operative part of the said order reads as under:

“19.We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. In our considered view, since the Division Bench of the Apex Court in the case of State of Uttaranchal (supra) has directed the Registry of the Apex Court to place the matter before the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India for constituting a Larger Bench, it will be in the fitness of things to adjourn this case sine die awaiting the decision of the Larger Bench to be so constituted. However, we make it clear that, if the decision of the Larger Bench when pronounced is in favour of the applicants, the respondents may, by themselves, grant relief sought by applicants in these Transfer Applications/Original Application.”

2. The aforesaid order will equally apply in the present case also.

Same Court & Year Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi · 2011 Same Parties Sunil Kumar vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board Thr... Same Subject Education Same Judge The Honourable Mr. G. George Paracken, Judicial Member &Amp; ...