Some Nath Ghosh Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Science Technology Department of Scientific and Industries Research Technology Bhawan, New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi and Another

Some Nath Ghosh vs Union of India Through Ministry of Science Technology Department of Scientific and Industries Resear

Type Court Judgment Court Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi Decided Nov 22, 2011

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/939402

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/939402
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Judge: V.K. Bali, Chairman &Amp; the Honourable Dr. R.C. Panda, Administrative Member
Decided On: Nov 22, 2011
Case Number: OA No. 2875 of 2011
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Some Nath Ghosh

Advocate For the Applicant: Dinesh Dwivedi, Sr. Advocate with Ashish Mohan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R.N. Singh and Ms. Jaishree Raj for D.S. Mahendru, Advocates.

Respondent

Union of India Through Ministry of Science Technology Department of Scientific and Industries Resear

Excerpt

(oral) justice v.k. bali, chairman: 1. learned counsel for the applicant states that the respondents have taken a preliminary objection as regards jurisdiction of the tribunal to entertain and decide this original application. it is the case of the respondents that this tribunal has no jurisdiction as the national research development corporation is not notified under section 14 of the administrative tribunals act 1985. 2. in view of the objection raised by the respondents, mr. ashish mohan, learned counsel for applicant seeks permission to withdraw this original application with liberty to the applicant to seek the relief(s) as asked for in the present oa before appropriate forum. 3. with leave and liberty, as prayed for, present original application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Full Judgment

(ORAL)

Justice V.K. Bali, Chairman:

1. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the respondents have taken a preliminary objection as regards jurisdiction of the Tribunal to entertain and decide this Original Application. It is the case of the respondents that this Tribunal has no jurisdiction as the National Research Development Corporation is not notified under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985.

2. In view of the objection raised by the respondents, Mr. Ashish Mohan, learned counsel for applicant seeks permission to withdraw this Original Application with liberty to the applicant to seek the relief(s) as asked for in the present OA before appropriate forum.

3. With leave and liberty, as prayed for, present Original Application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Same Court & Year Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi · 2011 Same Parties Some Nath Ghosh vs Union of India Through Ministry of Science... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge V.K. Bali, Chairman &Amp; the Honourable Dr. R.C. Panda, Admi...