Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

United States Vs. Moran

United States vs Moran

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-12-1923
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/93928

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
261 U.S. 321
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

United States

Respondent

Moran

Excerpt

united states v. moran - 261 u.s. 321 (1923) u.s. supreme court united states v. moran, 261 u.s. 321 (1923) united states v. moran no. 231 argued march 1, 1923 decided march 12, 1923 261 u.s. 321 appeal from the court of claims syllabus decided on the authority of united states v. allen, ante, 261 u. s. 317 . 56 ct.clms. 492, affirmed. appeal from a judgment of the court of claims awarding a sum as additional pay to a master-at-arms in the coast guard. mr. justice mc kenna delivered the opinion of the court. action for $600. judgment for $260.50. the case was submitted with united states v. allen, ante, 261 u. s. 317 , depends upon the same statute, and presents the question of the claim of a master at arms in the coast guard to receive pay at the rate allowed by the statute to a chief master at arms in the navy, less all pay previously received in the lower grade. moran enlisted in the united states revenue cutter service, the name of which has since been changed to the united states coast guard, as an ordinary seaman, and attained the rank of master at arms, the duties of which corresponded in all respects to the duties of chief master at arms in the navy. page 261 u. s. 322 moran therefore, since april 6, 1917, has been, and is, entitled to receive a rate of pay corresponding to that of a chief master at arms in the navy. had he been so paid, and as required by the act of may 22, 1917, 40 stat. 84, he would have received during the entire period from august 1, 1917, when he was placed on active duty, to december 31, 1918, the sum of $1,790.50. the pay received by him, however, was $1,530, leaving a balance due of $260.50. for this sum the court of claims gave judgment. the findings of the court sustain its action, and on the authority of the allen case, we affirm the judgment. affirmed.

Full Judgment

United States v. Moran - 261 U.S. 321 (1923)
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Moran, 261 U.S. 321 (1923)

United States v. Moran

No. 231

Argued March 1, 1923

Decided March 12, 1923

261 U.S. 321

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS

SYLLABUS

Decided on the authority of United States v. Allen, ante, 261 U. S. 317 .

56 Ct.Clms. 492, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims awarding a sum as additional pay to a master-at-arms in the Coast Guard.

MR. JUSTICE Mc KENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

Action for $600. Judgment for $260.50. The case was submitted with United States v. Allen, ante, 261 U. S. 317 , depends upon the same statute, and presents the question of the claim of a master at arms in the Coast Guard to receive pay at the rate allowed by the statute to a chief master at arms in the Navy, less all pay previously received in the lower grade.

Moran enlisted in the United States Revenue Cutter Service, the name of which has since been changed to the United States Coast Guard, as an ordinary seaman, and attained the rank of master at arms, the duties of which corresponded in all respects to the duties of chief master at arms in the Navy.

Page 261 U. S. 322

Moran therefore, since April 6, 1917, has been, and is, entitled to receive a rate of pay corresponding to that of a chief master at arms in the Navy. Had he been so paid, and as required by the Act of May 22, 1917, 40 Stat. 84, he would have received during the entire period from August 1, 1917, when he was placed on active duty, to December 31, 1918, the sum of $1,790.50. The pay received by him, however, was $1,530, leaving a balance due of $260.50. For this sum the Court of Claims gave judgment.

The findings of the court sustain its action, and on the authority of the Allen case, we affirm the judgment.

Affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial