M. Sivakumar and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

M. Sivakumar and Others vs Union of India and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam Decided Jan 17, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/938659

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/938659
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Judge: <Td Class="Btext" Bgcolor="#Ffffff"><Span Class="Boldtxt">Judges: </Span> the Honourable Dr. Justice K.B.S. Rajan, Judicial Member &Amp; the Honourable Mr. Justice K. George Joseph, Administrative Member
Decided On: Jan 17, 2012
Case Number: Original Application No. 866 of 2011
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M. Sivakumar and Others

Advocate For the Applicants: R. Sreeraj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Sunil Jacob Jose, SCGSC.

Respondent

Union of India and Others

Excerpt

dr. k.b.s. rajan, judicial member1. two of the applicants in this original application are stated to have already qualified in the 2010 examination and are undergoing training. in so far as the other applicants are concerned on the basis of an interim order dated 12.10.2011 they were permitted to participate in the examination held by the department in the recent past. their results are awaited.2. in their counsel statement the respondents in paragraph 6 stated as under:-"6. it is submitted that the respondents have complied with the directions of the hon'ble tribunal as directed in oa 803/10 and also the reliefs sought in the present oa. therefore, it is submitted that the grievance in the instant oa stands redressed and hence, it is most humbly prayed before the hon'ble tribunal that oa may be closed. the above counsel statement is filed on the basis of the brief instructions furnished by the department, reserving the right of the department to file a detailed reply statement if found necessary in the course of the hearing of the matter, at a later stage."3. the request by the respondents is to close the oa is on account of the applicants having been permitted to participate in the examination. we take it that the respondents are satisfied that the applicants are entitled to participate in the examination as we have been given to understand that even those who did not approach the tribunal have been permitted to participate in the examination. 4. taking judicial note of the above, this oa is closed. the results of the examination be declared and acted upon. no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

DR. K.B.S. RAJAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1. Two of the applicants in this Original Application are stated to have already qualified in the 2010 examination and are undergoing training. In so far as the other applicants are concerned on the basis of an interim order dated 12.10.2011 they were permitted to participate in the examination held by the department in the recent past. Their results are awaited.

2. In their counsel statement the respondents in paragraph 6 stated as under:-

"6. It is submitted that the respondents have complied with the directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal as directed in OA 803/10 and also the reliefs sought in the present OA. Therefore, it is submitted that the grievance in the instant OA stands redressed and hence, it is most humbly prayed before the Hon'ble Tribunal that OA may be closed. The above counsel statement is filed on the basis of the brief instructions furnished by the department, reserving the right of the department to file a detailed reply statement if found necessary in the course of the hearing of the matter, at a later stage."

3. The request by the respondents is to close the OA is on account of the applicants having been permitted to participate in the examination. We take it that the respondents are satisfied that the applicants are entitled to participate in the examination as we have been given to understand that even those who did not approach the Tribunal have been permitted to participate in the examination.

4. Taking judicial note of the above, this OA is closed. The results of the examination be declared and acted upon. No order as to costs.

Same Court & Year Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam · 2012 Same Parties M. Sivakumar and Others vs Union of India and Others Same Subject Education Same Judge Judges: the Honourable Dr. Justice K.B.S. Rajan, Judicial Mem...