S.C. Monga Vs. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Through Secretary, New Delhi and Another

S.C. Monga vs Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Through Secretary, New Delhi and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi Decided Dec 01, 2011

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/938006

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/938006
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Judge: V.K. Bali, Chairman &Amp; the Honourable Dr. R.C. Panda, Administrative Member
Decided On: Dec 01, 2011
Case Number: OA 4273 of 2011 MA 3206 of 2011
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.C. Monga

Advocate For the Applicant: Apurb Lal, Advocate. For the Respondents: -------

Respondent

Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Through Secretary, New Delhi and Another

Excerpt

(oral) justice v.k. bali, chairman: 1. sequel to a regular departmental enquiry, the applicant, who was director (engineering), was inflicted punishment of reduction of pay by one stage in the time scale of pay till his retirement, vide orders dated 02.07.2008. the applicant superannuated on 31.08.2008. against the order dated 2.7.2008, the applicant filed statutory appeal on 15.06.2011, which was barred by a period of about three years. concededly, no application for condonation of delay was filed nor even a mention was made in the appeal itself as to what were the reasons which prevented him to file an appeal earlier in point of time i.e. within 45 days from the date on which a copy of the impugned order came to be delivered to him. we are of the considered view that the appellate authority has rightly rejected the appeal of the applicant. 2. finding no merit, present original application stands dismissed.

Full Judgment

(ORAL)

Justice V.K. Bali, Chairman:

1. Sequel to a regular departmental enquiry, the applicant, who was Director (Engineering), was inflicted punishment of reduction of pay by one stage in the time scale of pay till his retirement, vide orders dated 02.07.2008. The applicant superannuated on 31.08.2008. Against the order dated 2.7.2008, the applicant filed statutory appeal on 15.06.2011, which was barred by a period of about three years. Concededly, no application for condonation of delay was filed nor even a mention was made in the appeal itself as to what were the reasons which prevented him to file an appeal earlier in point of time i.e. within 45 days from the date on which a copy of the impugned order came to be delivered to him. We are of the considered view that the appellate authority has rightly rejected the appeal of the applicant.

2. Finding no merit, present Original Application stands dismissed.

Same Court & Year Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi · 2011 Same Parties S.C. Monga vs Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Throug... Same Subject Education Same Judge V.K. Bali, Chairman &Amp; the Honourable Dr. R.C. Panda, Admi...