Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Subbammal and Others Vs. Thirumoorthy and Others

Subbammal and Others vs Thirumoorthy and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Sep 26, 2012
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/934489

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C.M.A.No.3247 of 2007
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Subbammal and Others

Advocate For the Petitioners: N.Manokaran, Advocate. For the Respondents: R3, K.Padmanabhan, Advocate.

Respondent

Thirumoorthy and Others

Excerpt

.....he was 58 years old. the tribunal had adopted the multiplier '8'. it had assessed his income at rs.5,581/- p.m. from that, it had deducted 1/3 and took the balance to assess loss of dependency. 5. in smt.sarala verma and others vs. delhi transport corporation and another [2009 (2) tn mac 1 (sc)], the hon'ble apex court held that, in case the dependents are 4 in numbers, the deduction towards pleasure and other expenses from the income of the deceased should be . so, in the facts and circumstances, only of the amount shall be deducted from the income of the deceased. thus, the loss of dependency is determined at rs.4,01,856/- (rs.5,581 - x 12 x 8). 6. the appellants are the near and dear ones of the deceased. loss of love and affection of the deceased to them is immeasurable. however, for such a loss, they have to be granted some reasonable monetary compensation. under this head, put together, the tribunal had granted them only rs.10,000/-. in the facts and circumstances, it is not correct. thus, under this head, each of them is awarded rs.10,000/-. in other respects, we are not interfering with the award of the tribunal. 7. in the result, the amount awarded by the tribunal is modified. the appellants are awarded a total compensation of rs.4,49,000/- with interest @ 7.5% p.a. from the date of filing of the claim petition till deposit. within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, the third respondent shall deposit the entire compensation amount, less amount, if any, already deposited. on such deposit, the appellants are permitted to withdraw their share of amount as allocated by the tribunal, less amount, if any, already withdrawn. this civil miscellaneous appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above. no costs.

Full Judgment

(PRAYER:- Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 18.08.2007 made in MCOP No.214 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.I), Erode.)

The appellants are the dependents of one Pappusamy, who died in a road accident, for whose death, the Tribunal had awarded them Rs.3,74,200/-.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants contended that since there are 4 dependents, the Tribunal ought not to have deducted 1/3 from the income of the deceased. On the whole, the Tribunal had awarded them less compensation.

3. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the Insurance Company contended that the Tribunal had taken into account all the relevant factors and awarded them proper compensation.

4. The deceased died when he was 58 years old. The Tribunal had adopted the multiplier '8'. It had assessed his income at Rs.5,581/- p.m. From that, it had deducted 1/3 and took the balance to assess loss of dependency.

5. In SMT.SARALA VERMA and OTHERS Vs. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION and ANOTHER [2009 (2) TN MAC 1 (SC)], the Hon'ble Apex Court held that, in case the dependents are 4 in numbers, the deduction towards pleasure and other expenses from the income of the deceased should be . So, in the facts and circumstances, only of the amount shall be deducted from the income of the deceased. Thus, the loss of dependency is determined at Rs.4,01,856/- (Rs.5,581 - x 12 x 8).

6. The appellants are the near and dear ones of the deceased. Loss of love and affection of the deceased to them is immeasurable. However, for such a loss, they have to be granted some reasonable monetary compensation. Under this head, put together, the Tribunal had granted them only Rs.10,000/-. In the facts and circumstances, it is not correct. Thus, under this head, each of them is awarded Rs.10,000/-. In other respects, we are not interfering with the award of the Tribunal.

7. In the result, the amount awarded by the Tribunal is modified. The appellants are awarded a total compensation of Rs.4,49,000/- with interest @ 7.5% p.a. from the date of filing of the claim petition till deposit. Within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment, the third respondent shall deposit the entire compensation amount, less amount, if any, already deposited. On such deposit, the appellants are permitted to withdraw their share of amount as allocated by the Tribunal, less amount, if any, already withdrawn. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial