Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Broadwell Vs. Carter County

Broadwell vs Carter County

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-26-1920
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/93263

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
253 U.S. 25
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Broadwell

Respondent

Carter County

Excerpt

broadwell v. carter county - 253 u.s. 25 (1920) u.s. supreme court broadwell v. carter county, 253 u.s. 25 (1920) broadwell v. carter county no. 289 submitted march 25, 1920 decided april 26, 1920 253 u.s. 25 certiorari to the supreme court of the state of oklahoma syllabus decided upon the authority of ward v. love county, ante, {10}1717. 71 okla. ___ reversed. the case is stated in the opinion. mr. justice van devanter delivered the opinion of the court. this is a proceeding to recover moneys charged to have been paid under compulsion by a number of choctaw and page 253 u. s. 26 chickasaw indians to carter county, oklahoma, as taxes on allotted lands which were nontaxable. the county commissioners disallowed the claim; the district court of the county to which the claimants appealed sustained a demurrer to their petition and rendered judgment against them, and the supreme court affirmed the judgment. 71 okla. ___. the total amount claimed is $22,455.99, aside from interest. the case as presented here is in all material respects like ward v. love county, ante, 253 u. s. 17 , and its decision properly may be rested on the opinion in that case. motion to dismiss denied. judgment reversed.

Full Judgment

Broadwell v. Carter County - 253 U.S. 25 (1920)
U.S. Supreme Court Broadwell v. Carter County, 253 U.S. 25 (1920)

Broadwell v. Carter County

No. 289

Submitted March 25, 1920

Decided April 26, 1920

253 U.S. 25

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

SYLLABUS

Decided upon the authority of Ward v. Love County, ante, {10}1717.

71 Okla. ___ reversed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a proceeding to recover moneys charged to have been paid under compulsion by a number of Choctaw and

Page 253 U. S. 26

Chickasaw Indians to Carter County, Oklahoma, as taxes on allotted lands which were nontaxable. The county commissioners disallowed the claim; the district court of the county to which the claimants appealed sustained a demurrer to their petition and rendered judgment against them, and the supreme court affirmed the judgment. 71 Okla. ___. The total amount claimed is $22,455.99, aside from interest.

The case as presented here is in all material respects like Ward v. Love County, ante, 253 U. S. 17 , and its decision properly may be rested on the opinion in that case.

Motion to dismiss denied.

Judgment reversed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial