Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Durai Mudaliar Vs. the Project Director,

Durai Mudaliar vs The Project Director,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 21, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/927496

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Writ Petition No.7830 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012
Subject
Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Constitution

Key legal issue
Constitution
Acts & sections
Constitution of India - Articles 226

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Durai Mudaliar

Advocate Mr.V.Balakrishnan, Adv

Respondent

The Project Director,

Advocate Mr.S.P.Prabakaran, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Constitution of India - Articles 226

Excerpt

prayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, seeking for a writ of certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order dated 12.2.2012 in na.ka.a/tna//la/nh/133/2010 of the 2nd respondent and quash the same.order1. this writ petition was listed under the caption `for withdrawal', based on the letter submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had also sought the permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition.2. based on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and in view of the letter submitted by the counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed, as withdrawn. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.  

Full Judgment

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order dated 12.2.2012 in Na.Ka.A/TNA//LA/NH/133/2010 of the 2nd respondent and quash the same.

ORDER

1. This writ petition was listed under the caption `for withdrawal', based on the letter submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had also sought the permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.

2. Based on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and in view of the letter submitted by the counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed, as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.  

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial